diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c index 9194b0698d63..9ae4a2aa7398 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ struct intel_percore { /* * Intel PerfMon, used on Core and later. */ -static const u64 intel_perfmon_event_map[] = +static u64 intel_perfmon_event_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_MAX] __read_mostly = { [PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES] = 0x003c, [PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS] = 0x00c0, @@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ static void intel_clovertown_quirks(void) * AJ106 could possibly be worked around by not allowing LBR * usage from PEBS, including the fixup. * AJ68 could possibly be worked around by always programming - * a pebs_event_reset[0] value and coping with the lost events. + * a pebs_event_reset[0] value and coping with the lost events. * * But taken together it might just make sense to not enable PEBS on * these chips. @@ -1412,6 +1412,18 @@ static __init int intel_pmu_init(void) x86_pmu.percore_constraints = intel_nehalem_percore_constraints; x86_pmu.enable_all = intel_pmu_nhm_enable_all; x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_nehalem_extra_regs; + + if (ebx & 0x40) { + /* + * Erratum AAJ80 detected, we work it around by using + * the BR_MISP_EXEC.ANY event. This will over-count + * branch-misses, but it's still much better than the + * architectural event which is often completely bogus: + */ + intel_perfmon_event_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = 0x7f89; + + pr_cont("erratum AAJ80 worked around, "); + } pr_cont("Nehalem events, "); break; |
