diff options
author | Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> | 2014-02-13 17:29:17 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2014-02-13 17:57:07 -0500 |
commit | a83045292daf9f07d0b103e5715ef527123d2fcc (patch) | |
tree | ea983884e77ae82b1f099713a7d11834b95e84a9 /net/tipc/bearer.c | |
parent | 7d33939f475d403e79124e3143d7951dcfe8629f (diff) | |
download | talos-obmc-linux-a83045292daf9f07d0b103e5715ef527123d2fcc.tar.gz talos-obmc-linux-a83045292daf9f07d0b103e5715ef527123d2fcc.zip |
tipc: remove bearer_lock from tipc_bearer struct
After the earlier commits ("tipc: remove 'links' list from
tipc_bearer struct") and ("tipc: introduce new spinlock to protect
struct link_req"), there is no longer any need to protect struct
link_req or or any link list by use of bearer_lock. Furthermore,
we have eliminated the need for using bearer_lock during downcalls
(send) from the link to the bearer, since we have ensured that
bearers always have a longer life cycle that their associated links,
and always contain valid data.
So, the only need now for a lock protecting bearers is for guaranteeing
consistency of the bearer list itself. For this, it is sufficient, at
least for the time being, to continue applying 'net_lock´ in write mode.
By removing bearer_lock we also pre-empt introduction of issue b) descibed
in the previous commit "tipc: remove 'links' list from tipc_bearer struct":
"b) When the outer protection from net_lock is gone, taking
bearer_lock and node_lock in opposite order of method 1) and 2)
will become an obvious deadlock hazard".
Therefore, we now eliminate the bearer_lock spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/tipc/bearer.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/tipc/bearer.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/net/tipc/bearer.c b/net/tipc/bearer.c index 60caa45e5a41..242cddd35a47 100644 --- a/net/tipc/bearer.c +++ b/net/tipc/bearer.c @@ -327,7 +327,6 @@ restart: b_ptr->net_plane = bearer_id + 'A'; b_ptr->active = 1; b_ptr->priority = priority; - spin_lock_init(&b_ptr->lock); res = tipc_disc_create(b_ptr, &b_ptr->bcast_addr, disc_domain); if (res) { @@ -351,9 +350,7 @@ static int tipc_reset_bearer(struct tipc_bearer *b_ptr) { read_lock_bh(&tipc_net_lock); pr_info("Resetting bearer <%s>\n", b_ptr->name); - spin_lock_bh(&b_ptr->lock); tipc_link_reset_list(b_ptr->identity); - spin_unlock_bh(&b_ptr->lock); read_unlock_bh(&tipc_net_lock); return 0; } @@ -365,19 +362,12 @@ static int tipc_reset_bearer(struct tipc_bearer *b_ptr) */ static void bearer_disable(struct tipc_bearer *b_ptr, bool shutting_down) { - struct tipc_link_req *temp_req; - pr_info("Disabling bearer <%s>\n", b_ptr->name); - spin_lock_bh(&b_ptr->lock); b_ptr->media->disable_media(b_ptr); - tipc_link_delete_list(b_ptr->identity, shutting_down); - temp_req = b_ptr->link_req; - b_ptr->link_req = NULL; - spin_unlock_bh(&b_ptr->lock); - - if (temp_req) - tipc_disc_delete(temp_req); + tipc_link_delete_list(b_ptr->identity, shutting_down); + if (b_ptr->link_req) + tipc_disc_delete(b_ptr->link_req); memset(b_ptr, 0, sizeof(struct tipc_bearer)); } |