diff options
| author | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> | 2009-06-17 16:27:19 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-06-18 13:03:48 -0700 |
| commit | 22a668d7c3ef833e7d67e9cef587ecc78069d532 (patch) | |
| tree | da9f2e7ea7224c347dfe33ea9d4dddd944c861ac /mm/memcontrol.c | |
| parent | 8a9478ca7f4bcb8945cec7f95d52dae2d5e50cbd (diff) | |
| download | talos-obmc-linux-22a668d7c3ef833e7d67e9cef587ecc78069d532.tar.gz talos-obmc-linux-22a668d7c3ef833e7d67e9cef587ecc78069d532.zip | |
memcg: fix behavior under memory.limit equals to memsw.limit
A user can set memcg.limit_in_bytes == memcg.memsw.limit_in_bytes when the
user just want to limit the total size of applications, in other words,
not very interested in memory usage itself. In this case, swap-out will
be done only by global-LRU.
But, under current implementation, memory.limit_in_bytes is checked at
first and try_to_free_page() may do swap-out. But, that swap-out is
useless for memsw.limit_in_bytes and the thread may hit limit again.
This patch tries to fix the current behavior at memory.limit ==
memsw.limit case. And documentation is updated to explain the behavior of
this special case.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/memcontrol.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/memcontrol.c | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index a83e0395444b..6ceb6f2dbac2 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -177,6 +177,9 @@ struct mem_cgroup { unsigned int swappiness; + /* set when res.limit == memsw.limit */ + bool memsw_is_minimum; + /* * statistics. This must be placed at the end of memcg. */ @@ -847,6 +850,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem, int ret, total = 0; int loop = 0; + /* If memsw_is_minimum==1, swap-out is of-no-use. */ + if (root_mem->memsw_is_minimum) + noswap = true; + while (loop < 2) { victim = mem_cgroup_select_victim(root_mem); if (victim == root_mem) @@ -1752,6 +1759,12 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, break; } ret = res_counter_set_limit(&memcg->res, val); + if (!ret) { + if (memswlimit == val) + memcg->memsw_is_minimum = true; + else + memcg->memsw_is_minimum = false; + } mutex_unlock(&set_limit_mutex); if (!ret) @@ -1799,6 +1812,12 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, break; } ret = res_counter_set_limit(&memcg->memsw, val); + if (!ret) { + if (memlimit == val) + memcg->memsw_is_minimum = true; + else + memcg->memsw_is_minimum = false; + } mutex_unlock(&set_limit_mutex); if (!ret) |
