diff options
author | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> | 2016-12-14 15:06:46 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2016-12-14 16:04:08 -0800 |
commit | b5fa01a22e4ba9e3ca6de7cb94c3d21e42da449c (patch) | |
tree | 2fcea15a5c609e51abf25e6cff6e1630627ed068 /ipc/sem.c | |
parent | f150f02cfbc7b6b980e260856555abd73235a6b0 (diff) | |
download | talos-obmc-linux-b5fa01a22e4ba9e3ca6de7cb94c3d21e42da449c.tar.gz talos-obmc-linux-b5fa01a22e4ba9e3ca6de7cb94c3d21e42da449c.zip |
ipc/sem: simplify wait-wake loop
Instead of using the reverse goto, we can simplify the flow and make it
more language natural by just doing do-while instead. One would hope
this is the standard way (or obviously just with a while bucle) that we
do wait/wakeup handling in the kernel. The exact same logic is kept,
just more indented.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1478708774-28826-2-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'ipc/sem.c')
-rw-r--r-- | ipc/sem.c | 108 |
1 files changed, 52 insertions, 56 deletions
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c index 4f5af6e7d630..a82c88d0900f 100644 --- a/ipc/sem.c +++ b/ipc/sem.c @@ -1963,71 +1963,67 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(semtimedop, int, semid, struct sembuf __user *, tsops, sma->complex_count++; } -sleep_again: - queue.status = -EINTR; - queue.sleeper = current; + do { + queue.status = -EINTR; + queue.sleeper = current; - __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); - sem_unlock(sma, locknum); - rcu_read_unlock(); + __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); + sem_unlock(sma, locknum); + rcu_read_unlock(); - if (timeout) - jiffies_left = schedule_timeout(jiffies_left); - else - schedule(); + if (timeout) + jiffies_left = schedule_timeout(jiffies_left); + else + schedule(); - /* - * fastpath: the semop has completed, either successfully or not, from - * the syscall pov, is quite irrelevant to us at this point; we're done. - * - * We _do_ care, nonetheless, about being awoken by a signal or - * spuriously. The queue.status is checked again in the slowpath (aka - * after taking sem_lock), such that we can detect scenarios where we - * were awakened externally, during the window between wake_q_add() and - * wake_up_q(). - */ - error = READ_ONCE(queue.status); - if (error != -EINTR) { /* - * User space could assume that semop() is a memory barrier: - * Without the mb(), the cpu could speculatively read in user - * space stale data that was overwritten by the previous owner - * of the semaphore. + * fastpath: the semop has completed, either successfully or + * not, from the syscall pov, is quite irrelevant to us at this + * point; we're done. + * + * We _do_ care, nonetheless, about being awoken by a signal or + * spuriously. The queue.status is checked again in the + * slowpath (aka after taking sem_lock), such that we can detect + * scenarios where we were awakened externally, during the + * window between wake_q_add() and wake_up_q(). */ - smp_mb(); - goto out_free; - } - - rcu_read_lock(); - sma = sem_obtain_lock(ns, semid, sops, nsops, &locknum); - error = READ_ONCE(queue.status); + error = READ_ONCE(queue.status); + if (error != -EINTR) { + /* + * User space could assume that semop() is a memory + * barrier: Without the mb(), the cpu could + * speculatively read in userspace stale data that was + * overwritten by the previous owner of the semaphore. + */ + smp_mb(); + goto out_free; + } - /* - * Array removed? If yes, leave without sem_unlock(). - */ - if (IS_ERR(sma)) { - rcu_read_unlock(); - goto out_free; - } + rcu_read_lock(); + sma = sem_obtain_lock(ns, semid, sops, nsops, &locknum); + error = READ_ONCE(queue.status); - /* - * If queue.status != -EINTR we are woken up by another process. - * Leave without unlink_queue(), but with sem_unlock(). - */ - if (error != -EINTR) - goto out_unlock_free; + /* + * Array removed? If yes, leave without sem_unlock(). + */ + if (IS_ERR(sma)) { + rcu_read_unlock(); + goto out_free; + } - /* - * If an interrupt occurred we have to clean up the queue. - */ - if (timeout && jiffies_left == 0) - error = -EAGAIN; + /* + * If queue.status != -EINTR we are woken up by another process. + * Leave without unlink_queue(), but with sem_unlock(). + */ + if (error != -EINTR) + goto out_unlock_free; - /* - * If the wakeup was spurious, just retry. - */ - if (error == -EINTR && !signal_pending(current)) - goto sleep_again; + /* + * If an interrupt occurred we have to clean up the queue. + */ + if (timeout && jiffies_left == 0) + error = -EAGAIN; + } while (error == -EINTR && !signal_pending(current)); /* spurious */ unlink_queue(sma, &queue); |