diff options
author | Craig Gallek <kraig@google.com> | 2016-04-12 13:11:25 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2016-04-14 21:14:03 -0400 |
commit | d894ba18d4e449b3a7f6eb491f16c9e02933736e (patch) | |
tree | 9a0987a506c9caa46daf10a58abd2bc141b06745 /include/linux | |
parent | c5b5343cfbc9f46af65033fa4f407d7b7d98371d (diff) | |
download | talos-obmc-linux-d894ba18d4e449b3a7f6eb491f16c9e02933736e.tar.gz talos-obmc-linux-d894ba18d4e449b3a7f6eb491f16c9e02933736e.zip |
soreuseport: fix ordering for mixed v4/v6 sockets
With the SO_REUSEPORT socket option, it is possible to create sockets
in the AF_INET and AF_INET6 domains which are bound to the same IPv4 address.
This is only possible with SO_REUSEPORT and when not using IPV6_V6ONLY on
the AF_INET6 sockets.
Prior to the commits referenced below, an incoming IPv4 packet would
always be routed to a socket of type AF_INET when this mixed-mode was used.
After those changes, the same packet would be routed to the most recently
bound socket (if this happened to be an AF_INET6 socket, it would
have an IPv4 mapped IPv6 address).
The change in behavior occurred because the recent SO_REUSEPORT optimizations
short-circuit the socket scoring logic as soon as they find a match. They
did not take into account the scoring logic that favors AF_INET sockets
over AF_INET6 sockets in the event of a tie.
To fix this problem, this patch changes the insertion order of AF_INET
and AF_INET6 addresses in the TCP and UDP socket lists when the sockets
have SO_REUSEPORT set. AF_INET sockets will be inserted at the head of the
list and AF_INET6 sockets with SO_REUSEPORT set will always be inserted at
the tail of the list. This will force AF_INET sockets to always be
considered first.
Fixes: e32ea7e74727 ("soreuseport: fast reuseport UDP socket selection")
Fixes: 125e80b88687 ("soreuseport: fast reuseport TCP socket selection")
Reported-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Craig Gallek <kraig@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux')
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/rculist_nulls.h | 39 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h b/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h index 1c33dd7da4a7..4ae95f7e8597 100644 --- a/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h +++ b/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h @@ -98,6 +98,45 @@ static inline void hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(struct hlist_nulls_node *n, if (!is_a_nulls(first)) first->pprev = &n->next; } + +/** + * hlist_nulls_add_tail_rcu + * @n: the element to add to the hash list. + * @h: the list to add to. + * + * Description: + * Adds the specified element to the end of the specified hlist_nulls, + * while permitting racing traversals. NOTE: tail insertion requires + * list traversal. + * + * The caller must take whatever precautions are necessary + * (such as holding appropriate locks) to avoid racing + * with another list-mutation primitive, such as hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu() + * or hlist_nulls_del_rcu(), running on this same list. + * However, it is perfectly legal to run concurrently with + * the _rcu list-traversal primitives, such as + * hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(), used to prevent memory-consistency + * problems on Alpha CPUs. Regardless of the type of CPU, the + * list-traversal primitive must be guarded by rcu_read_lock(). + */ +static inline void hlist_nulls_add_tail_rcu(struct hlist_nulls_node *n, + struct hlist_nulls_head *h) +{ + struct hlist_nulls_node *i, *last = NULL; + + for (i = hlist_nulls_first_rcu(h); !is_a_nulls(i); + i = hlist_nulls_next_rcu(i)) + last = i; + + if (last) { + n->next = last->next; + n->pprev = &last->next; + rcu_assign_pointer(hlist_nulls_next_rcu(last), n); + } else { + hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(n, h); + } +} + /** * hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu - iterate over rcu list of given type * @tpos: the type * to use as a loop cursor. |