diff options
author | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> | 2013-12-02 11:04:13 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2014-01-06 01:43:44 +0100 |
commit | ab1b1c4e8223f9ee66aa93aaf64c36e77cadffac (patch) | |
tree | b592025459590a4564fd8e7760707c7d77a159e1 /drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c | |
parent | f7ba3b41e27129575201f0f9656e83fb67e86c3b (diff) | |
download | talos-obmc-linux-ab1b1c4e8223f9ee66aa93aaf64c36e77cadffac.tar.gz talos-obmc-linux-ab1b1c4e8223f9ee66aa93aaf64c36e77cadffac.zip |
cpufreq: send new set of notification for transition failures
In the current code, if we fail during a frequency transition, we
simply send the POSTCHANGE notification with the old frequency. This
isn't enough.
One of the core users of these notifications is the code responsible
for keeping loops_per_jiffy aligned with frequency changes. And mostly
it is written as:
if ((val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE && freq->old < freq->new) ||
(val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old > freq->new)) {
update-loops-per-jiffy...
}
So, suppose we are changing to a higher frequency and failed during
transition, then following will happen:
- CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE notification with freq-new > freq-old
- CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notification with freq-new == freq-old
The first one will update loops_per_jiffy and second one will do
nothing. Even if we send the 2nd notification by exchanging values of
freq-new and old, some users of these notifications might get
unstable.
This can be fixed by simply calling cpufreq_notify_post_transition()
with error code and this routine will take care of sending
notifications in the correct order.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[rjw: Folded 3 patches into one, rebased unicore2 changes]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c index e2b4f40ff69a..1c0f1067af73 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c @@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ static int pcc_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, cpu, target_freq, (pcch_virt_addr + pcc_cpu_data->input_offset)); + freqs.old = policy->cur; freqs.new = target_freq; cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); @@ -228,25 +229,20 @@ static int pcc_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, memset_io((pcch_virt_addr + pcc_cpu_data->input_offset), 0, BUF_SZ); status = ioread16(&pcch_hdr->status); + iowrite16(0, &pcch_hdr->status); + + cpufreq_notify_post_transition(policy, &freqs, status != CMD_COMPLETE); + spin_unlock(&pcc_lock); + if (status != CMD_COMPLETE) { pr_debug("target: FAILED for cpu %d, with status: 0x%x\n", cpu, status); - goto cmd_incomplete; + return -EINVAL; } - iowrite16(0, &pcch_hdr->status); - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); pr_debug("target: was SUCCESSFUL for cpu %d\n", cpu); - spin_unlock(&pcc_lock); return 0; - -cmd_incomplete: - freqs.new = freqs.old; - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); - iowrite16(0, &pcch_hdr->status); - spin_unlock(&pcc_lock); - return -EINVAL; } static int pcc_get_offset(int cpu) |