From cb3d02c0ed928b1c1a98a7df49274835eb4e6133 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: apbianco <apbianco@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 19:45:05 +0000
Subject: 2001-07-12  Alexandre Petit-Bianco  <apbianco@redhat.com>

	* libjava.compile/anon_ctor_itf_arg.java: Moved to `libjava.lang.'
	* libjava.compile/anon_ctor_itf_arg.out: Likewise
	* libjava.lang/invoke_from_inner.java: New file.
	* libjava.lang/invoke_from_inner.out: Likewise.

(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2001-q3/msg00061.html )


git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@43994 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
---
 .../testsuite/libjava.lang/invoke_from_inner.java  | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/invoke_from_inner.java

(limited to 'libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/invoke_from_inner.java')

diff --git a/libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/invoke_from_inner.java b/libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/invoke_from_inner.java
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8659ac6d559
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/invoke_from_inner.java
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// This test case once showed that `f[0].execute(x)' woudln't be
+// expanded properly, attempting to retrieve this$0 to be used in
+// place of `f[0]'.
+
+abstract class A {
+    abstract public void execute(C x);
+}
+
+class C {}
+
+class Z extends A {
+    public void execute (C x) {
+	System.out.println ("Z.execute");
+    }
+}
+
+public class invoke_from_inner extends A {
+
+    Z f[] = new Z[1];
+    class D extends C {
+	D (C x) {
+	    f[0].execute (x);
+	    execute (x);
+	}
+    }
+    public void execute (C x) {
+      System.out.println ("invoke_from_inner.execute");
+    }
+
+    public static void main (String a[]) {
+	new invoke_from_inner().foo();
+    }
+    void foo () {
+	f[0] = new Z();
+	new D(new C());
+    }
+}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3