buildroot/boot/Config.in, branch 2016.02

gummiboot: new package

2014-02-19T22:28:35+00:00

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni Signed-off-by: Christophe Vu-Brugier Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard

grub2: add new package

2014-02-19T22:28:04+00:00

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard

package: remove the empty trailing line(s)

2014-01-04T09:39:29+00:00

Signed-off-by: Jerzy Grzegorek Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard

boot-wrapper-aarch64: new package

2012-11-02T20:10:18+00:00

The boot wrapper contains both a minimal bootloader and a tool to generate an image suitable for execution by the AArch64 software simulator. The image generated embeds the minimal bootloader, the kernel image, the Device Tree Blob and the kernel command line. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard

at91bootstrap3: new package

2012-08-17T15:58:16+00:00

Note that this new package, at91bootstrap3, is being added alongside the existing at91bootstrap. This was suggested by Thomas Petazzoni, whose comments on the mailing list are quoted below. For this package, I am not sure we can do a simple version bump. Since there is (was?) no upstream for AT91Bootstrap 1.x, many vendors/companies had to maintain their patches on top of AT91Bootstrap 1.x. See for example board/calao/usb-a9263/at91bootstrap-1.16-usb-a9263.patch. Therefore, removing AT91Bootstrap 1.x from the tree will prevent those platforms to work. I know people should upgrade, but AT91Bootstrap 3.x is quite significantly different, so the porting effort is not that simple. Therefore, I'm wondering whether we should kee at91bootstrap as it is, and create a separate package at91bootstrap3 for the 3.x generation. Signed-off-by: Simon Dawson Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni

Add MXS bootlets package

2012-07-20T22:34:57+00:00

MXS platforms (imx23 and imx28) are relying on bootlets as their first stage bootloaders, that can then either start a regular second stage bootloader or directly a Linux kernel. However, the Makefile allows only to build u-boot and linux images at the same time, which is not very convenient as we will more likely use only one of them, so we need to duplicate a bit what is already done so that we are able to choose what we want to generate. thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com: * Remove incorrect dependency on BR2_PACKAGE_ELFTOSB * Each board configuration option is for one board, not multiple boards, so use singular. * The i.MX28 support is for i.MX28 EVK only, reflect that in the option prompt and the option name. * Use 'generic-package' instead of GENTARGETS Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni

lpc32xx: Add CDL to the available bootloaders

2012-02-01T22:30:44+00:00

This will build kickstart and s1l for the selected board and install them alongside u-boot. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard

boot: Reorder entries alphabetically

2012-02-01T22:30:22+00:00

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard

Add x-loader bootloader

2011-07-11T21:41:29+00:00

Signed-off-by: Philippe Reynes Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni merge xloader Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard

u-boot: rename to uboot

2011-07-11T21:39:52+00:00

This will allow to match the currently Config.in option BR2_TARGET_UBOOT, in order to make it easy to integrate U-Boot into the package infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard