From 6e6fddc78323533be570873abb728b7e0ba7e024 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:30:14 +0200 Subject: bpf: fix panic due to oob in bpf_prog_test_run_skb sykzaller triggered several panics similar to the below: [...] [ 248.851531] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.857656] Read of size 985 at addr ffff8808017ffff2 by task a.out/1425 [...] [ 248.865902] CPU: 1 PID: 1425 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #13 [ 248.865903] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5039MS-H12TRF/X11SSE-F, BIOS 2.1a 03/08/2018 [ 248.865905] Call Trace: [ 248.865910] dump_stack+0xd6/0x185 [ 248.865911] ? show_regs_print_info+0xb/0xb [ 248.865913] ? printk+0x9c/0xc3 [ 248.865915] ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0xe4/0xe4 [ 248.865919] print_address_description+0x6f/0x270 [ 248.865920] kasan_report+0x25b/0x380 [ 248.865922] ? _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865924] check_memory_region+0x137/0x190 [ 248.865925] kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [ 248.865927] _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865930] bpf_test_finish.isra.8+0x4f/0xc0 [ 248.865932] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x6a0/0xba0 [...] After scrubbing the BPF prog a bit from the noise, turns out it called bpf_skb_change_head() for the lwt_xmit prog with headroom of 2. Nothing wrong in that, however, this was run with repeat >> 0 in bpf_prog_test_run_skb() and the same skb thus keeps changing until the pskb_expand_head() called from skb_cow() keeps bailing out in atomic alloc context with -ENOMEM. So upon return we'll basically have 0 headroom left yet blindly do the __skb_push() of 14 bytes and keep copying data from there in bpf_test_finish() out of bounds. Fix to check if we have enough headroom and if pskb_expand_head() fails, bail out with error. Another bug independent of this fix (but related in triggering above) is that BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN should be reworked to reset the skb/xdp buffer to it's original state from input as otherwise repeating the same test in a loop won't work for benchmarking when underlying input buffer is getting changed by the prog each time and reused for the next run leading to unexpected results. Fixes: 1cf1cae963c2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command") Reported-by: syzbot+709412e651e55ed96498@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+54f39d6ab58f39720a55@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tools') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 2ecd27b670d7..f5f7bcc96046 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -4974,6 +4974,24 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT, }, + { + "make headroom for LWT_XMIT", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 34), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_skb_change_head), + /* split for s390 to succeed */ + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 42), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_skb_change_head), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT, + }, { "invalid access of tc_classid for LWT_IN", .insns = { @@ -12554,8 +12572,11 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, } if (fd_prog >= 0) { + __u8 tmp[TEST_DATA_LEN << 2]; + __u32 size_tmp = sizeof(tmp); + err = bpf_prog_test_run(fd_prog, 1, test->data, - sizeof(test->data), NULL, NULL, + sizeof(test->data), tmp, &size_tmp, &retval, NULL); if (err && errno != 524/*ENOTSUPP*/ && errno != EPERM) { printf("Unexpected bpf_prog_test_run error\n"); -- cgit v1.2.1