From 918049f0135854a1583f9b3b88f44dbf2b027329 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "David S. Miller" Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:03:24 -0700 Subject: [XFRM]: Fix xfrm_state_num going negative. Missing counter bump when hashing in a new ACQ xfrm_state. Now that we have two spots to do the hash grow check, break it out into a helper function. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 17 +++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/xfrm') diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c index 39b8bf3a9ded..84bbf8474f3e 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c @@ -614,6 +614,14 @@ out: return x; } +static void xfrm_hash_grow_check(int have_hash_collision) +{ + if (have_hash_collision && + (xfrm_state_hmask + 1) < xfrm_state_hashmax && + xfrm_state_num > xfrm_state_hmask) + schedule_work(&xfrm_hash_work); +} + static void __xfrm_state_insert(struct xfrm_state *x) { unsigned int h; @@ -642,10 +650,7 @@ static void __xfrm_state_insert(struct xfrm_state *x) xfrm_state_num++; - if (x->bydst.next != NULL && - (xfrm_state_hmask + 1) < xfrm_state_hashmax && - xfrm_state_num > xfrm_state_hmask) - schedule_work(&xfrm_hash_work); + xfrm_hash_grow_check(x->bydst.next != NULL); } /* xfrm_state_lock is held */ @@ -753,6 +758,10 @@ static struct xfrm_state *__find_acq_core(unsigned short family, u8 mode, u32 re h = xfrm_src_hash(daddr, saddr, family); hlist_add_head(&x->bysrc, xfrm_state_bysrc+h); wake_up(&km_waitq); + + xfrm_state_num++; + + xfrm_hash_grow_check(x->bydst.next != NULL); } return x; -- cgit v1.2.1