From 54e9e29132d7caefcad470281cae06ac34a982c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:00:39 -0700
Subject: mm, oom: pass an oom order of -1 when triggered by sysrq

The force_kill member of struct oom_control isn't needed if an order of -1
is used instead.  This is the same as order == -1 in struct
compact_control which requires full memory compaction.

This patch introduces no functional change.

Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'mm/page_alloc.c')

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 96536144185c..5f9394df19bf 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2698,7 +2698,6 @@ __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 		.nodemask = ac->nodemask,
 		.gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
 		.order = order,
-		.force_kill = false,
 	};
 	struct page *page;
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.1