From ebcf28e1c7a295f3321249dd235ad2e45938fdd9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Morton Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 03:18:04 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] fadvise(): write commands Add two new linux-specific fadvise extensions(): LINUX_FADV_ASYNC_WRITE: start async writeout of any dirty pages between file offsets `offset' and `offset+len'. Any pages which are currently under writeout are skipped, whether or not they are dirty. LINUX_FADV_WRITE_WAIT: wait upon writeout of any dirty pages between file offsets `offset' and `offset+len'. By combining these two operations the application may do several things: LINUX_FADV_ASYNC_WRITE: push some or all of the dirty pages at the disk. LINUX_FADV_WRITE_WAIT, LINUX_FADV_ASYNC_WRITE: push all of the currently dirty pages at the disk. LINUX_FADV_WRITE_WAIT, LINUX_FADV_ASYNC_WRITE, LINUX_FADV_WRITE_WAIT: push all of the currently dirty pages at the disk, wait until they have been written. It should be noted that none of these operations write out the file's metadata. So unless the application is strictly performing overwrites of already-instantiated disk blocks, there are no guarantees here that the data will be available after a crash. To complete this suite of operations I guess we should have a "sync file metadata only" operation. This gives applications access to all the building blocks needed for all sorts of sync operations. But sync-metadata doesn't fit well with the fadvise() interface. Probably it should be a new syscall: sys_fmetadatasync(). The patch also diddles with the meaning of `endbyte' in sys_fadvise64_64(). It is made to represent that last affected byte in the file (ie: it is inclusive). Generally, all these byterange and pagerange functions are inclusive so we can easily represent EOF with -1. As Ulrich notes, these two functions are somewhat abusive of the fadvise() concept, which appears to be "set the future policy for this fd". But these commands are a perfect fit with the fadvise() impementation, and several of the existing fadvise() commands are synchronous and don't affect future policy either. I think we can live with the slight incongruity. Cc: Michael Kerrisk Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/filemap.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'mm/filemap.c') diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c index c1b1708cc95d..3ef20739e725 100644 --- a/mm/filemap.c +++ b/mm/filemap.c @@ -183,8 +183,8 @@ static int sync_page(void *word) * these two operations is that if a dirty page/buffer is encountered, it must * be waited upon, and not just skipped over. */ -static int __filemap_fdatawrite_range(struct address_space *mapping, - loff_t start, loff_t end, int sync_mode) +int __filemap_fdatawrite_range(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t start, + loff_t end, int sync_mode) { int ret; struct writeback_control wbc = { @@ -213,8 +213,8 @@ int filemap_fdatawrite(struct address_space *mapping) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_fdatawrite); -static int filemap_fdatawrite_range(struct address_space *mapping, - loff_t start, loff_t end) +static int filemap_fdatawrite_range(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t start, + loff_t end) { return __filemap_fdatawrite_range(mapping, start, end, WB_SYNC_ALL); } @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_flush); * Wait for writeback to complete against pages indexed by start->end * inclusive */ -static int wait_on_page_writeback_range(struct address_space *mapping, +int wait_on_page_writeback_range(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end) { struct pagevec pvec; -- cgit v1.2.1