From b862f3b099f3ea672c7438c0b282ce8201d39dfc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 15:24:18 -0700 Subject: i386: improve and correct inline asm memory constraints Use "+m" rather than a combination of "=m" and "m" for improved clarity and consistency. This also fixes some inlines that incorrectly didn't tell the compiler that they read the old value at all, potentially causing the compiler to generate bogus code. It appear that all of those potential bugs were hidden by the use of extra "volatile" specifiers on the data structures in question, though. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- include/asm-i386/semaphore.h | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/asm-i386/semaphore.h') diff --git a/include/asm-i386/semaphore.h b/include/asm-i386/semaphore.h index f7a0f310c524..d51e800acf29 100644 --- a/include/asm-i386/semaphore.h +++ b/include/asm-i386/semaphore.h @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static inline void down(struct semaphore * sem) "call __down_failed\n\t" "jmp 1b\n" LOCK_SECTION_END - :"=m" (sem->count) + :"+m" (sem->count) : :"memory","ax"); } @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static inline int down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem) "call __down_failed_interruptible\n\t" "jmp 1b\n" LOCK_SECTION_END - :"=a" (result), "=m" (sem->count) + :"=a" (result), "+m" (sem->count) : :"memory"); return result; @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static inline int down_trylock(struct semaphore * sem) "call __down_failed_trylock\n\t" "jmp 1b\n" LOCK_SECTION_END - :"=a" (result), "=m" (sem->count) + :"=a" (result), "+m" (sem->count) : :"memory"); return result; @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static inline void up(struct semaphore * sem) "jmp 1b\n" LOCK_SECTION_END ".subsection 0\n" - :"=m" (sem->count) + :"+m" (sem->count) : :"memory","ax"); } -- cgit v1.2.1