From 1a747ee0cc11a198f9e2435add821bd0dfedb7c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:08:22 -0400 Subject: locks: don't call ->copy_lock methods on return of conflicting locks The file_lock structure is used both as a heavy-weight representation of an active lock, with pointers to reference-counted structures, etc., and as a simple container for parameters that describe a file lock. The conflicting lock returned from __posix_lock_file is an example of the latter; so don't call the filesystem or lock manager callbacks when copying to it. This also saves the need for an unnecessary locks_init_lock in the nfsv4 server. Thanks to Trond for pointing out the error. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields Cc: Trond Myklebust --- fs/lockd/svclock.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/lockd') diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c index 1f122c1940af..4d81553d2948 100644 --- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c +++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ nlmsvc_update_deferred_block(struct nlm_block *block, struct file_lock *conf, block->b_flags |= B_TIMED_OUT; if (conf) { if (block->b_fl) - locks_copy_lock(block->b_fl, conf); + __locks_copy_lock(block->b_fl, conf); } } -- cgit v1.2.1