From 66ad863b410efb7f537719006f9ac52400c1a5c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Whitehouse Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:35:05 +0000 Subject: GFS2: Fix nlink setting on inode creation Since the nlink count will be 0, we need to use set_nlink rather than inc_nlink in order to avoid triggering the inc_nlink warning which was added recently. Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse --- fs/gfs2/inode.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/gfs2/inode.c') diff --git a/fs/gfs2/inode.c b/fs/gfs2/inode.c index 017960cf1d7a..a7d611b93f0f 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/inode.c +++ b/fs/gfs2/inode.c @@ -599,9 +599,7 @@ static int link_dinode(struct gfs2_inode *dip, const struct qstr *name, error = gfs2_meta_inode_buffer(ip, &dibh); if (error) goto fail_end_trans; - inc_nlink(&ip->i_inode); - if (S_ISDIR(ip->i_inode.i_mode)) - inc_nlink(&ip->i_inode); + set_nlink(&ip->i_inode, S_ISDIR(ip->i_inode.i_mode) ? 2 : 1); gfs2_trans_add_bh(ip->i_gl, dibh, 1); gfs2_dinode_out(ip, dibh->b_data); brelse(dibh); -- cgit v1.2.1