From 0c4d2d95d06e920e0c61707e62c7fffc9c57f63a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:03:02 -0400 Subject: Btrfs: use i_version instead of our own sequence We've been keeping around the inode sequence number in hopes that somebody would use it, but nobody uses it and people actually use i_version which serves the same purpose, so use i_version where we used the incore inode's sequence number and that way the sequence is updated properly across the board, and not just in file write. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/xattr.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/xattr.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/xattr.c b/fs/btrfs/xattr.c index e7a5659087e6..3f4e2d69e83a 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/xattr.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/xattr.c @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ int __btrfs_setxattr(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, if (ret) goto out; + inode_inc_iversion(inode); inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME; ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, inode); BUG_ON(ret); -- cgit v1.2.1