From 3d7806eca43e73a9721d2e09369200ed93036bd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Schmidt Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:29:29 +0200 Subject: Btrfs: add btrfs_next_old_leaf To make sense of the tree mod log, the backref walker not only needs btrfs_search_old_slot, but it also called btrfs_next_leaf, which in turn was calling btrfs_search_slot. This obviously didn't give the correct result. This commit adds btrfs_next_old_leaf, a drop-in replacement for btrfs_next_leaf with a time_seq parameter. If it is zero, it behaves exactly like btrfs_next_leaf. If it is non-zero, it will use btrfs_search_old_slot with this time_seq parameter. Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/ctree.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c index 50d7c99ddce7..cb76b2a1b908 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c @@ -5016,6 +5016,12 @@ next: * returns < 0 on io errors. */ int btrfs_next_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path) +{ + return btrfs_next_old_leaf(root, path, 0); +} + +int btrfs_next_old_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path, + u64 time_seq) { int slot; int level; @@ -5041,7 +5047,10 @@ again: path->keep_locks = 1; path->leave_spinning = 1; - ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, path, 0, 0); + if (time_seq) + ret = btrfs_search_old_slot(root, &key, path, time_seq); + else + ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, path, 0, 0); path->keep_locks = 0; if (ret < 0) -- cgit v1.2.1