From 40154b824331cd9c81c06545761338f3d80a36e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Oberparleiter Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:57:03 +0200 Subject: [S390] cio async subchannel reprobe. Changes in the DASD driver require an asynchronous implementation of the subchannel reprobe loop. This loop was so far only used by the blacklisting mechanism but is now available to all CCW device drivers. Signed-off-by: Peter Oberparleiter Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky --- drivers/s390/cio/blacklist.c | 35 +---------------------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 34 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/s390/cio/blacklist.c') diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/blacklist.c b/drivers/s390/cio/blacklist.c index 0960bef7b199..15b895496a45 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/cio/blacklist.c +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/blacklist.c @@ -224,39 +224,6 @@ is_blacklisted (int ssid, int devno) } #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS -static int -__s390_redo_validation(struct subchannel_id schid, void *data) -{ - int ret; - struct subchannel *sch; - - sch = get_subchannel_by_schid(schid); - if (sch) { - /* Already known. */ - put_device(&sch->dev); - return 0; - } - ret = css_probe_device(schid); - if (ret == -ENXIO) - return ret; /* We're through. */ - if (ret == -ENOMEM) - /* Stop validation for now. Bad, but no need for a panic. */ - return ret; - return 0; -} - -/* - * Function: s390_redo_validation - * Look for no longer blacklisted devices - * FIXME: there must be a better way to do this */ -static inline void -s390_redo_validation (void) -{ - CIO_TRACE_EVENT (0, "redoval"); - - for_each_subchannel(__s390_redo_validation, NULL); -} - /* * Function: blacklist_parse_proc_parameters * parse the stuff which is piped to /proc/cio_ignore @@ -281,7 +248,7 @@ blacklist_parse_proc_parameters (char *buf) return; } - s390_redo_validation (); + css_schedule_reprobe(); } /* Iterator struct for all devices. */ -- cgit v1.2.1