From fefa8ff810c5ab4c4206aed9d159c4d6fe8d4f1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aaron Plattner Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 11:27:32 -0700 Subject: cpufreq: unlock when failing cpufreq_update_policy() Commit bd0fa9bb455d introduced a failure path to cpufreq_update_policy() if cpufreq_driver->get(cpu) returns NULL. However, it jumps to the 'no_policy' label, which exits without unlocking any of the locks the function acquired earlier. This causes later calls into cpufreq to hang. Fix this by creating a new 'unlock' label and jumping to that instead. Fixes: bd0fa9bb455d ("cpufreq: Return error if ->get() failed in cpufreq_update_policy()") Link: https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/751903/kernel-3-15-and-nv-drivers-337-340-failed-to-initialize-the-nvidia-kernel-module-gtx-550-ti-/ Signed-off-by: Aaron Plattner Cc: 3.15+ # 3.15+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c') diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index aed2b0cb83dc..62259d27f03e 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2242,10 +2242,8 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu) struct cpufreq_policy new_policy; int ret; - if (!policy) { - ret = -ENODEV; - goto no_policy; - } + if (!policy) + return -ENODEV; down_write(&policy->rwsem); @@ -2264,7 +2262,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu) new_policy.cur = cpufreq_driver->get(cpu); if (WARN_ON(!new_policy.cur)) { ret = -EIO; - goto no_policy; + goto unlock; } if (!policy->cur) { @@ -2279,10 +2277,10 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu) ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy); +unlock: up_write(&policy->rwsem); cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); -no_policy: return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_update_policy); -- cgit v1.2.1