From 4e70daaf05a181b6968e29e72e9f1c16a183e92c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiri Kosina Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:29:23 +0100 Subject: tpm_tis: fix tis_lock with respect to RCU cleanup_tis() -> tpm_remove_hardware() -> syncrhonize_rcu() is being called in an atomic context (tis_lock spinlock held), which is not allowed. Convert tis_lock to mutex. Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina Tested-by: Stefan Berger Acked-by: Rajiv Andrade --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c') diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c index a1748621111b..70fac9abb0e2 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ enum tis_defaults { #define TPM_RID(l) (0x0F04 | ((l) << 12)) static LIST_HEAD(tis_chips); -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(tis_lock); +static DEFINE_MUTEX(tis_lock); #if defined(CONFIG_PNP) && defined(CONFIG_ACPI) static int is_itpm(struct pnp_dev *dev) @@ -689,9 +689,9 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, resource_size_t start, } INIT_LIST_HEAD(&chip->vendor.list); - spin_lock(&tis_lock); + mutex_lock(&tis_lock); list_add(&chip->vendor.list, &tis_chips); - spin_unlock(&tis_lock); + mutex_unlock(&tis_lock); return 0; @@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ static void __exit cleanup_tis(void) { struct tpm_vendor_specific *i, *j; struct tpm_chip *chip; - spin_lock(&tis_lock); + mutex_lock(&tis_lock); list_for_each_entry_safe(i, j, &tis_chips, list) { chip = to_tpm_chip(i); tpm_remove_hardware(chip->dev); @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static void __exit cleanup_tis(void) iounmap(i->iobase); list_del(&i->list); } - spin_unlock(&tis_lock); + mutex_unlock(&tis_lock); #ifdef CONFIG_PNP if (!force) { pnp_unregister_driver(&tis_pnp_driver); -- cgit v1.2.1