From 9a28f9dc8d10b619af9a37b1e27c41ada5415629 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:50:53 -0800
Subject: x86/mm: memblock: switch to use NUMA_NO_NODE

Update X86 code to use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of MAX_NUMNODES while
calling memblock APIs, because memblock API will be changed to use
NUMA_NO_NODE and will produce warning during boot otherwise.

See:
 https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/9/898

Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/mm/memtest.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'arch/x86/mm')

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c b/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
index 8dabbed409ee..1e9da795767a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void __init do_one_pass(u64 pattern, u64 start, u64 end)
 	u64 i;
 	phys_addr_t this_start, this_end;
 
-	for_each_free_mem_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &this_start, &this_end, NULL) {
+	for_each_free_mem_range(i, NUMA_NO_NODE, &this_start, &this_end, NULL) {
 		this_start = clamp_t(phys_addr_t, this_start, start, end);
 		this_end = clamp_t(phys_addr_t, this_end, start, end);
 		if (this_start < this_end) {
-- 
cgit v1.2.1