From 871b72dd1e12afc3f024479531d25a9339d2e3f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dmitry Adamushko Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:48:27 +0200 Subject: x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko Acked-by: Hugh Dickins Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Rusty Russell Cc: Andreas Herrmann Cc: Peter Oruba Cc: Arjan van de Ven LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines) --- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c index 453b5795a5c6..c8be20f16447 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c @@ -13,25 +13,13 @@ * Licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public * License version 2. See file COPYING for details. */ -#include -#include -#include #include -#include -#include #include #include #include #include #include -#include -#include -#include -#include -#include #include -#include -#include #include #include @@ -79,9 +67,6 @@ struct microcode_amd { #define UCODE_CONTAINER_SECTION_HDR 8 #define UCODE_CONTAINER_HEADER_SIZE 12 -/* serialize access to the physical write */ -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(microcode_update_lock); - static struct equiv_cpu_entry *equiv_cpu_table; static int collect_cpu_info_amd(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig) @@ -144,9 +129,8 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev) return 1; } -static void apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) +static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) { - unsigned long flags; u32 rev, dummy; int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id(); struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu_num; @@ -156,25 +140,25 @@ static void apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) BUG_ON(cpu_num != cpu); if (mc_amd == NULL) - return; + return 0; - spin_lock_irqsave(µcode_update_lock, flags); wrmsrl(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LOADER, (u64)(long)&mc_amd->hdr.data_code); /* get patch id after patching */ rdmsr(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL, rev, dummy); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(µcode_update_lock, flags); /* check current patch id and patch's id for match */ if (rev != mc_amd->hdr.patch_id) { printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d: update failed " "(for patch_level=0x%x)\n", cpu, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id); - return; + return -1; } printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: CPU%d: updated (new patch_level=0x%x)\n", cpu, rev); uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; + + return 0; } static int get_ucode_data(void *to, const u8 *from, size_t n) @@ -263,7 +247,8 @@ static void free_equiv_cpu_table(void) } } -static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, const u8 *data, size_t size) +static enum ucode_state +generic_load_microcode(int cpu, const u8 *data, size_t size) { struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; const u8 *ucode_ptr = data; @@ -272,12 +257,13 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, const u8 *data, size_t size) int new_rev = uci->cpu_sig.rev; unsigned int leftover; unsigned long offset; + enum ucode_state state = UCODE_OK; offset = install_equiv_cpu_table(ucode_ptr); if (!offset) { printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: failed to create " "equivalent cpu table\n"); - return -EINVAL; + return UCODE_ERROR; } ucode_ptr += offset; @@ -312,28 +298,27 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, const u8 *data, size_t size) pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d found a matching microcode " "update with version 0x%x (current=0x%x)\n", cpu, new_rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev); - } else + } else { vfree(new_mc); - } + state = UCODE_ERROR; + } + } else + state = UCODE_NFOUND; free_equiv_cpu_table(); - return (int)leftover; + return state; } -static int request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device) +static enum ucode_state request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device) { const char *fw_name = "amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin"; const struct firmware *firmware; - int ret; - - /* We should bind the task to the CPU */ - BUG_ON(cpu != raw_smp_processor_id()); + enum ucode_state ret; - ret = request_firmware(&firmware, fw_name, device); - if (ret) { + if (request_firmware(&firmware, fw_name, device)) { printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: failed to load file %s\n", fw_name); - return ret; + return UCODE_NFOUND; } ret = generic_load_microcode(cpu, firmware->data, firmware->size); @@ -343,11 +328,12 @@ static int request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device) return ret; } -static int request_microcode_user(int cpu, const void __user *buf, size_t size) +static enum ucode_state +request_microcode_user(int cpu, const void __user *buf, size_t size) { printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: AMD microcode update via " "/dev/cpu/microcode not supported\n"); - return -1; + return UCODE_ERROR; } static void microcode_fini_cpu_amd(int cpu) -- cgit v1.2.1 From aeef50bc0483fa70ce0bddb686ec84a274b7f3d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Figo.zhang" Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 22:30:36 +0800 Subject: x86, microcode: Simplify vfree() use vfree() does its own 'NULL' check, so no need for check before calling it. In v2, remove the stray newline. [ Impact: cleanup ] Signed-off-by: Figo.zhang Cc: Dmitry Adamushko LKML-Reference: <1244385036.3402.11.camel@myhost> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c index c8be20f16447..366baa179913 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c @@ -241,10 +241,8 @@ static int install_equiv_cpu_table(const u8 *buf) static void free_equiv_cpu_table(void) { - if (equiv_cpu_table) { - vfree(equiv_cpu_table); - equiv_cpu_table = NULL; - } + vfree(equiv_cpu_table); + equiv_cpu_table = NULL; } static enum ucode_state @@ -279,8 +277,7 @@ generic_load_microcode(int cpu, const u8 *data, size_t size) mc_header = (struct microcode_header_amd *)mc; if (get_matching_microcode(cpu, mc, new_rev)) { - if (new_mc) - vfree(new_mc); + vfree(new_mc); new_rev = mc_header->patch_id; new_mc = mc; } else @@ -292,8 +289,7 @@ generic_load_microcode(int cpu, const u8 *data, size_t size) if (new_mc) { if (!leftover) { - if (uci->mc) - vfree(uci->mc); + vfree(uci->mc); uci->mc = new_mc; pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d found a matching microcode " "update with version 0x%x (current=0x%x)\n", -- cgit v1.2.1