From 5229ee185287f4fd0d7809e6554b40ec83a4ba6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kumar Gala Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:29:46 -0500 Subject: [POWERPC] Remove hack to determine the 2nd PHBs bus number Now that we have the pci_controller in the exclude function we can easy figure out if the bus number is the PHB or not. The old style of using a variable setup at init time was actually broken and would only work in specific cases. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/pci.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/pci.c') diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/pci.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/pci.c index 72a1bc5e0c2d..be67f67ee6f4 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/pci.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/pci.c @@ -33,8 +33,6 @@ #define DBG(x...) #endif -int mpc85xx_pci2_busno = 0; - #ifdef CONFIG_PCI int __init mpc85xx_add_bridge(struct device_node *dev) { @@ -74,7 +72,6 @@ int __init mpc85xx_add_bridge(struct device_node *dev) setup_indirect_pci(hose, immr + 0x9000, immr + 0x9004); primary = 0; hose->bus_offset = hose->first_busno; - mpc85xx_pci2_busno = hose->first_busno; } printk(KERN_INFO "Found MPC85xx PCI host bridge at 0x%016llx. " -- cgit v1.2.1