From 4ffc84442572669727dc4fcd976582508eaf23e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: OGAWA Hirofumi Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 03:07:44 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Move cond_resched() after iput() in sync_sb_inodes() In here, I think the following order is more cache-friendly. Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index 785c7213a54f..f3fbe2d030f4 100644 --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct writeback_control *wbc) list_move(&inode->i_list, &sb->s_dirty); } spin_unlock(&inode_lock); - cond_resched(); iput(inode); + cond_resched(); spin_lock(&inode_lock); if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) break; -- cgit v1.2.1