| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
introduce pv_irq_ops which adds hooks to paravirtualize irq related
operations.
On virtualized environment, interruption may be replaced by something
virtualization friendly. So the irq related operation also may need
paravirtualization.
This patch adds necessary hooks to paravirtualize irq related operations.
Signed-off-by: Yaozu (Eddie) Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix the problem that the following error message is sometimes displayed
at irq migration when vector domain is enabled.
"Unexpected interrupt vector %d on CPU %d is not mapped to any IRQ!"
The cause of this problem is an interrupt is sent to the previous
target CPU after cleaning up vector to irq mapping table. To clean up
vector to irq map on the previous target CPU safty, change the irq
migration in multiple vector domain as follows. The original idea is
from x86 interrupt management code.
- Delay vector to irq table cleanup until the interrupts are sent
to new target CPUs. By this, it is ensured that target CPU is
completely changed on the interrupt controller side.
- Even after the interrupts are sent to new target CPUs, there can
be pended interrupts remaining on the previous target CPU. So we
need to delay clearning up vector to irq table until the pended
interrupt is handled. For this, send IPI to the previous target
CPU with lower priority vector and clean up vector to irq table
in its handler.
This patch affects only to irq migration code with multiple vector
domain is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
s/addres/address/
s/performanc/performance/
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add base support for implementing platform_irq_to_vector(), and
then use it on SN2.
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: John Keller <jpk@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add support for IRQ migration across vector domain.
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add fundamental support for multiple vector domain. There still exists
only one vector domain even with this patch. IRQ migration across
domain is not supported yet by this patch.
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add mapping tables between irqs and vectors, and its management code.
This is necessary for supporting multiple vector domain because 1:1
mapping between irq and vector will be changed to n:1.
The irq == vector relationship between irqs and vectors is explicitly
remained for percpu interrupts, platform interrupts, isa IRQs and
vectors assigned using assign_irq_vector() because some programs might
depend on it.
And I should consider the following problem.
When pci drivers enabled/disabled devices dynamically, its irq number
is changed to the different one. Therefore, suspend/resume code may
happen problem.
To fix this problem, I bound gsi to irq.
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds an optional method for purging the TLB on SN IA64 systems.
The change should not affect any non-SN system.
Signed-off-by: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add ->retrigger() irq op to consolidate hw_irq_resend() implementations.
(Most architectures had it defined to NOP anyway.)
NOTE: ia64 needs testing. i386 and x86_64 tested.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Abstract IA64_FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR/IA64_LAST_DEVICE_VECTOR since SN platforms
use a subset of the IA64 range. Implement this by making the above macros
global variables which the platform can override in it setup code.
Also add a reserve_irq_vector() routine used by SN to mark a vector's as
in-use when that weren't allocated through assign_irq_vector().
Signed-off-by: Mark Maule <maule@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When handling writes to /proc/irq, current code is re-programming rte
entries directly. This is not recommended and could potentially cause
chipset's to lockup, or cause missing interrupts.
CONFIG_IRQ_BALANCE does this correctly, where it re-programs only when the
interrupt is pending. The same needs to be done for /proc/irq handling as well.
Otherwise user space irq balancers are really not doing the right thing.
- Changed pending_irq_balance_cpumask to pending_irq_migrate_cpumask for
lack of a generic name.
- added move_irq out of IRQ_BALANCE, and added this same to X86_64
- Added new proc handler for write, so we can do deferred write at irq
handling time.
- Display of /proc/irq/XX/smp_affinity used to display CPU_MASKALL, instead
it now shows only active cpu masks, or exactly what was set.
- Provided a common move_irq implementation, instead of duplicating
when using generic irq framework.
Tested on i386/x86_64 and ia64 with CONFIG_PCI_MSI turned on and off.
Tested UP builds as well.
MSI testing: tbd: I have cards, need to look for a x-over cable, although I
did test an earlier version of this patch. Will test in a couple days.
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Acked-by: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@holomorphy.com>
Grudgingly-acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Signed-off-by: Coywolf Qi Hunt <coywolf@lovecn.org>
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current assign_irq_vector() will panic if interrupt vectors is running
out. But I think how to handle the case of lack of interrupt vectors
should be handled by the caller of this function. For example, some
PCI devices can raise the interrupt signal via both MSI and I/O
APIC. So even if the driver for these device fails to allocate a
vector for MSI, the driver still has a chance to use I/O APIC based
interrupt. But currently there is no chance for these driver to use
I/O APIC based interrupt because kernel will panic when
assign_irq_vector() fails to allocate interrupt vector.
The following patch changes assign_irq_vector() for ia64 to return
-ENOSPC on error instead of panic (as i386 and x86_64 versions do).
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current ia64 linux cannot handle greater than 184 interrupt sources
because of the lack of vectors. The following patch enables ia64 linux
to handle greater than 184 interrupt sources by allowing the same
vector number to be shared by multiple IOSAPIC's RTEs. The design of
this patch is besed on "Intel(R) Itanium(R) Processor Family Interrupt
Architecture Guide".
Even if you don't have a large I/O system, you can see the behavior of
vector sharing by changing IOSAPIC_LAST_DEVICE_VECTOR to fewer value.
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|