summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/ubifs/key.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* UBIFS: amend key_hash return valueArtem Bityutskiy2009-03-081-3/+3
| | | | | | ... which should be uint32_t, not int. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
* UBIFS: avoid unnecessary checksKukkonen Mika2008-12-031-14/+18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I have a habit of compiling kernel with EXTRA_CFLAGS="-Wextra -Wno-unused -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-missing-field-initializers" and so fs/ubifs/key.h give lots (~10) of these every time: CC fs/ubifs/tnc_misc.o In file included from fs/ubifs/ubifs.h:1725, from fs/ubifs/tnc_misc.c:30: fs/ubifs/key.h: In function 'key_r5_hash': fs/ubifs/key.h:64: warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true fs/ubifs/key.h: In function 'key_test_hash': fs/ubifs/key.h:81: warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true This patch fixes the warnings. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
* UBIFS: endian handling fixes and annotationsHarvey Harrison2008-11-061-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Noticed by sparse: fs/ubifs/file.c:75:2: warning: restricted __le64 degrades to integer fs/ubifs/file.c:629:4: warning: restricted __le64 degrades to integer fs/ubifs/dir.c:431:3: warning: restricted __le64 degrades to integer This should be checked to ensure the ubifs_assert is working as intended, I've done the suggested annotation in this patch. fs/ubifs/sb.c:298:6: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/ubifs/sb.c:298:6: expected int [signed] [assigned] tmp fs/ubifs/sb.c:298:6: got restricted __le64 [usertype] <noident> fs/ubifs/sb.c:299:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/ubifs/sb.c:299:19: expected restricted __le64 [usertype] atime_sec fs/ubifs/sb.c:299:19: got int [signed] [assigned] tmp fs/ubifs/sb.c:300:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/ubifs/sb.c:300:19: expected restricted __le64 [usertype] ctime_sec fs/ubifs/sb.c:300:19: got int [signed] [assigned] tmp fs/ubifs/sb.c:301:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/ubifs/sb.c:301:19: expected restricted __le64 [usertype] mtime_sec fs/ubifs/sb.c:301:19: got int [signed] [assigned] tmp This looks like a bugfix as your tmp was a u32 so there was truncation in the atime, mtime, ctime value, probably not intentional, add a tmp_le64 and use it here. fs/ubifs/key.h:348:9: warning: cast to restricted __le32 fs/ubifs/key.h:348:9: warning: cast to restricted __le32 fs/ubifs/key.h:419:9: warning: cast to restricted __le32 Read from the annotated union member instead. fs/ubifs/recovery.c:175:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/ubifs/recovery.c:175:13: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] save_flags fs/ubifs/recovery.c:175:13: got restricted __le32 [usertype] flags fs/ubifs/recovery.c:186:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/ubifs/recovery.c:186:13: expected restricted __le32 [usertype] flags fs/ubifs/recovery.c:186:13: got unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] save_flags Do byteshifting at compile time of the flag value. Annotate the saved_flags as le32. fs/ubifs/debug.c:368:10: warning: cast to restricted __le32 fs/ubifs/debug.c:368:10: warning: cast from restricted __le64 Should be checked if the truncation was intentional, I've changed the printk to print the full width. Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
* UBIFS: add bulk-read facilityAdrian Hunter2008-09-301-1/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | Some flash media are capable of reading sequentially at faster rates. UBIFS bulk-read facility is designed to take advantage of that, by reading in one go consecutive data nodes that are also located consecutively in the same LEB. Read speed on Arm platform with OneNAND goes from 17 MiB/s to 19 MiB/s. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
* UBIFS: add new flash file systemArtem Bityutskiy2008-07-151-0/+533
This is a new flash file system. See http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud