summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* PCI: Make CARDBUS_MEM_SIZE and CARDBUS_IO_SIZE boot optionsAtsushi Nemoto2007-02-161-17/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CARDBUS_MEM_SIZE was increased to 64MB on 2.6.20-rc2, but larger size might result in allocation failure for the reserving itself on some platforms (for example typical 32bit MIPS). Make it (and CARDBUS_IO_SIZE too) customizable by "pci=" option for such platforms. Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Cc: Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz@gmx.ch> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
* [PATCH] increase CARDBUS_MEM_SIZEAndrew Morton2006-12-221-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Linus sayeth: Google knows everything, and finds, on MS own site no less: "Windows 2000 default resources: One 4K memory window One 2 MB memory window Two 256-byte I/O windows" which is clearly utterly bogus and insufficient. But Microsoft apparently realized this, and: "Windows XP default resources: Because one memory window of 4K and one window of 2 MB are not sufficient for CardBus controllers in many configurations, Windows XP allocates larger memory windows to CardBus controllers where possible. However, resource windows are static (that is, the operating system does not dynamically allocate larger memory windows if new devices appear.) Under Windows XP, CardBus controllers will be assigned the following resources: One 4K memory window, as in Windows 2000 64 MB memory, if that amount of memory is available. If 64 MB is not available the controller will receive 32 MB; if 32 MB is not available, the controller will receive 16 MB; if 16 MB is not available, the bridge will receive 8 MB; and so on down to a minimum assignment of 1 MB in configurations where memory is too constrained for the operating system to provide a larger window. Two 256-byte I/O windows" So I think we have our answer. Windows uses one 4k window, and one 64MB window. And they are no more dynamic than we are (we _could_ try to do it dynamically, but let's face it, it's fairly painful to dynamically expand PCI bus resources - you may need to reprogram everything up to the root, so it would be absolutely crazy to do that unless you have some serious masochistic tendencies). So let's just increase our default value to 64M too. Cc: Markus Rechberger <mrechberger@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz@gmx.ch> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [PATCH] fix "PCI: assign ioapic resource at hotplug"Kenji Kaneshige2006-10-041-5/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Roland Dreier wrote: > The change "PCI: assign ioapic resource at hotplug" (commit > 23186279658cea6d42a050400d3e79c56cb459b4 in Linus's tree) makes > networking stop working on my system (SuperMicro H8QC8 with four > dual-core Opteron 885 CPUs). In particular, the on-board NIC stops > working, probably because it gets assigned the wrong IRQ (225 in the > non-working case, 217 in the working case) > > With that patch applied, e1000 doesn't work. Reverting just that > patch (shown below) from Linus's latest tree fixes things for me. > The cause of this problem might be an wrong assumption that the 'start' member of resource structure for ioapic device has non-zero value if the resources are assigned by firmware. The 'start' member of ioapic device seems not to be set even though the resources were actually assigned to ioapic devices by firmware. Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: MUNEDA Takahiro <muneda.takahiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* PCI: assign ioapic resource at hotplugSatoru Takeuchi2006-09-261-3/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | We need to assign resources to ioapics being hot-added. This patch changes pbus_assign_resources_sorted() to assign resources if the ioapic has no assigned resources. Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: MUNEDA Takahiro <muneda.takahiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
* [PATCH] 64bit resource: fix up printks for resources in pci core and hotplug ↵Greg Kroah-Hartman2006-06-271-2/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | drivers This is needed if we wish to change the size of the resource structures. Based on an original patch from Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
* [PATCH] PCI: don't move ioapics below PCI bridgeKimball Murray2006-06-211-2/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A recent Stratus x86_64 platform uses a system ioapic that is a PCI device located below a PCI bridge. Other platforms like this may exist. This patch fixes a problem wherein the kernel's PCI setup code moves the ioapic to an address other than that assigned by the BIOS. It simply adds another exclusion (which already includes classless devices and host bridges) to the function pbus_assign_resources_sorted so that it will not move the ioapic. If the ioapic is moved, the fixmap mapping to it is broken, so the OS should leave it alone. From: Kimball Murray <kimball.murray@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
* cardbus: limit IO windows to 256 bytesLinus Torvalds2005-10-231-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | That's what we've always historically done, and bigger windows seem to confuse some cardbus bridges. Or something. Alan reports that this makes the ThinkPad 600x series work properly again: the 4kB IO window for some reason made IDE DMA not work, which makes IDE painfully slow even if it works after DMA timeouts. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [PATCH] yenta: share code with PCI coreDominik Brodowski2005-09-091-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | Share code between setup-bus.c and yenta_socket.c: use the write-out code of resources to the bridge also in yenta_socket.c, as it provides useful debug output. In addition, it fixes the bug that the CPU-centric resource view might need to be transferred to the PCI-centric view: setup-bus.c does that, while yenta-socket.c did not. Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [PATCH] x86: pci_assign_unassigned_resources() updateIvan Kokshaysky2005-08-301-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I had some time to think about PCI assign issues in 2.6.13-rc series. The major problem here is that we call pci_assign_unassigned_resources() way too early - at subsys_initcall level. Therefore we give no chances to ACPI and PnP routines (called at fs_initcall level) to reserve their respective resources properly, as the comments in drivers/pnp/system.c and drivers/acpi/motherboard.c suggest: /** * Reserve motherboard resources after PCI claim BARs, * but before PCI assign resources for uninitialized PCI devices */ So I moved the pci_assign_unassigned_resources() call to pcibios_assign_resources() (fs_initcall), which should hopefully fix a lot of problems and make PCIBIOS_MIN_IO tweaks unnecessary. Other changes: - remove resource assignment code from pcibios_assign_resources(), since it duplicates pci_assign_unassigned_resources() functionality and actually does nothing in 2.6.13; - modify ROM assignment code as per Ben's suggestion: try to use firmware settings by default (if PCI_ASSIGN_ROMS is not set); - set CARDBUS_IO_SIZE back to 4K as it's a wonderful stress test for various setups. Confirmed by Tero Roponen <teanropo@cc.jyu.fi> (who had problems with the 4kB CardBus IO size previously). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* Only pre-allocate 256 bytes of cardbio IO rangeLinus Torvalds2005-08-261-1/+1
| | | | | | | | It may seem small, but most cards need much less, if any, and this not only makes the code adhere to the comment, it seems to fix a boot-time lockup on a ThinkPad 380XD laptop reported by Tero Roponen <teanropo@cc.jyu.fi> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [PATCH] PCI: remove PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_VGA handling from setup-bus.cIvan Kokshaysky2005-07-291-12/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The setup-bus code doesn't work correctly for configurations with more than one display adapter in the same PCI domain. This stuff actually is a leftover of an early 2.4 PCI setup code and apparently it stopped working after some "bridge_ctl" changes. So the best thing we can do is just to remove it and rely on the fact that any firmware *has* to configure VGA port forwarding for the boot display device properly. But then we need to ensure that the bus->bridge_ctl will always contain valid information collected at the probe time, therefore the following change in pci_scan_bridge() is needed. Signed-off-by: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [PATCH] yet another fix for setup-bus.c/x86 mergeIvan Kokshaysky2005-07-061-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There is a slight disagreement between setup-bus.c code and traditional x86 PCI setup wrt which recourses are invalid vs resources that are free for further allocations. In particular, in the setup-bus.c, if we failed to allocate some resource, we nullify "start" and "flags" fields, but *not* the "end" one. But x86 pcibios_enable_resources() does the following check: if (!r->start && r->end) { printk(KERN_ERR "PCI: Device %s not available because of resource collisions\n", pci_name(dev)); return -EINVAL; which means that the device owning the offending resource cannot be enabled. In particular, this breaks cardbus behind the normal decode p2p bridge - the cardbus code from setup-bus.c requests rather large IO and MEM windows, and if it fails, the socket is completely unavailable. Which is wrong, as the yenta code is capable to allocate smaller windows. Signed-off-by: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [PATCH] PCI: pci_assign_unassigned_resources() on x86Ivan Kokshaysky2005-07-011-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Add sanity check for io[port,mem]_resource in setup-bus.c. These resources look like "free" as they have no parents, but obviously we must not touch them. - In i386.c:pci_allocate_bus_resources(), if a bridge resource cannot be allocated for some reason, then clear its flags. This prevents any child allocations in this range, so the setup-bus code will work with a clean resource sub-tree. - i386.c:pcibios_enable_resources() doesn't enable bridges, as it checks only resources 0-5, which looks like a clear bug to me. I suspect it might break hotplug as well in some cases. From: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
* [PATCH] acpi bridge hotadd: Remove hot-plugged devices that could not be ↵Rajesh Shah2005-06-271-1/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | allocated resources When hot-plugging an I/O hierarchy that contains many bridges and leaf devices, it's possible that there are not enough resources to start all the device present. If we fail to assign a resource, clear the corresponding value in the pci_dev structure, so other code can take corrective action. Signed-off-by: Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
* Linux-2.6.12-rc2v2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds2005-04-161-0/+552
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud