| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Impact: fix boot crash
Need to exit early if the addr is far above 64k.
The crash got exposed by:
78a8b35: x86: make e820_update_range() handle small range update
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <49BC2279.2030101@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Impact: fix crashes under Xen due to unrobust e820 code
find_e820_area_size() must return a properly distinguishable and
out-of-bounds value when it fails, and -1UL does not meet that
criteria on i386/PAE. Additionally, callers of the function must
check against that value.
early_reserve_e820() should be prepared for the region found to be
outside of the addressable range on 32-bits.
e820_update_range_map() should not blindly update e820, but should do
all it work on the map it got a pointer passed for (which in 50% of the
cases is &e820_saved). It must also not call e820_add_region(), as that
again acts on e820 unconditionally.
The issues were found when trying to make this option work in our Xen
kernel (i.e. where some of the silent assumptions made in the code
would not hold).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
LKML-Reference: <49B9171B.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Impact: cleanup
now that the code is moved and converted to a work queue,
there's some minor cleanups that can be done.
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Impact: change the implementation of the debug feature
the periodic corruption checks are better off run from a work queue; there's
nothing time critical about them and this way the amount of
interrupt-context work is reduced.
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
|
|
Impact: cleanup
The corruption check code is rather sizable and it's likely to grow over
time when we add checks for more types of corruptions (there's a few
candidates in kerneloops.org that I want to add checks for)... so lets move
it to its own file
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
