diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/keys-request-key.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/keys-request-key.txt | 54 |
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/keys-request-key.txt b/Documentation/keys-request-key.txt index 22488d791168..c1f64fdf84cb 100644 --- a/Documentation/keys-request-key.txt +++ b/Documentation/keys-request-key.txt @@ -3,16 +3,23 @@ =================== The key request service is part of the key retention service (refer to -Documentation/keys.txt). This document explains more fully how that the -requesting algorithm works. +Documentation/keys.txt). This document explains more fully how the requesting +algorithm works. The process starts by either the kernel requesting a service by calling -request_key(): +request_key*(): struct key *request_key(const struct key_type *type, const char *description, const char *callout_string); +or: + + struct key *request_key_with_auxdata(const struct key_type *type, + const char *description, + const char *callout_string, + void *aux); + Or by userspace invoking the request_key system call: key_serial_t request_key(const char *type, @@ -20,16 +27,26 @@ Or by userspace invoking the request_key system call: const char *callout_info, key_serial_t dest_keyring); -The main difference between the two access points is that the in-kernel -interface does not need to link the key to a keyring to prevent it from being -immediately destroyed. The kernel interface returns a pointer directly to the -key, and it's up to the caller to destroy the key. +The main difference between the access points is that the in-kernel interface +does not need to link the key to a keyring to prevent it from being immediately +destroyed. The kernel interface returns a pointer directly to the key, and +it's up to the caller to destroy the key. + +The request_key_with_auxdata() call is like the in-kernel request_key() call, +except that it permits auxiliary data to be passed to the upcaller (the default +is NULL). This is only useful for those key types that define their own upcall +mechanism rather than using /sbin/request-key. The userspace interface links the key to a keyring associated with the process to prevent the key from going away, and returns the serial number of the key to the caller. +The following example assumes that the key types involved don't define their +own upcall mechanisms. If they do, then those should be substituted for the +forking and execution of /sbin/request-key. + + =========== THE PROCESS =========== @@ -40,8 +57,8 @@ A request proceeds in the following manner: interface]. (2) request_key() searches the process's subscribed keyrings to see if there's - a suitable key there. If there is, it returns the key. If there isn't, and - callout_info is not set, an error is returned. Otherwise the process + a suitable key there. If there is, it returns the key. If there isn't, + and callout_info is not set, an error is returned. Otherwise the process proceeds to the next step. (3) request_key() sees that A doesn't have the desired key yet, so it creates @@ -62,7 +79,7 @@ A request proceeds in the following manner: instantiation. (7) The program may want to access another key from A's context (say a - Kerberos TGT key). It just requests the appropriate key, and the keyring + Kerberos TGT key). It just requests the appropriate key, and the keyring search notes that the session keyring has auth key V in its bottom level. This will permit it to then search the keyrings of process A with the @@ -79,10 +96,11 @@ A request proceeds in the following manner: (10) The program then exits 0 and request_key() deletes key V and returns key U to the caller. -This also extends further. If key W (step 7 above) didn't exist, key W would be -created uninstantiated, another auth key (X) would be created (as per step 3) -and another copy of /sbin/request-key spawned (as per step 4); but the context -specified by auth key X will still be process A, as it was in auth key V. +This also extends further. If key W (step 7 above) didn't exist, key W would +be created uninstantiated, another auth key (X) would be created (as per step +3) and another copy of /sbin/request-key spawned (as per step 4); but the +context specified by auth key X will still be process A, as it was in auth key +V. This is because process A's keyrings can't simply be attached to /sbin/request-key at the appropriate places because (a) execve will discard two @@ -118,17 +136,17 @@ A search of any particular keyring proceeds in the following fashion: (2) It considers all the non-keyring keys within that keyring and, if any key matches the criteria specified, calls key_permission(SEARCH) on it to see - if the key is allowed to be found. If it is, that key is returned; if + if the key is allowed to be found. If it is, that key is returned; if not, the search continues, and the error code is retained if of higher priority than the one currently set. (3) It then considers all the keyring-type keys in the keyring it's currently - searching. It calls key_permission(SEARCH) on each keyring, and if this + searching. It calls key_permission(SEARCH) on each keyring, and if this grants permission, it recurses, executing steps (2) and (3) on that keyring. The process stops immediately a valid key is found with permission granted to -use it. Any error from a previous match attempt is discarded and the key is +use it. Any error from a previous match attempt is discarded and the key is returned. When search_process_keyrings() is invoked, it performs the following searches @@ -153,7 +171,7 @@ The moment one succeeds, all pending errors are discarded and the found key is returned. Only if all these fail does the whole thing fail with the highest priority -error. Note that several errors may have come from LSM. +error. Note that several errors may have come from LSM. The error priority is: |
