diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 36 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 702 |
2 files changed, 585 insertions, 153 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h index 91a583bb3fa7..1f23408024ee 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h @@ -76,6 +76,14 @@ struct bpf_reg_state { s64 smax_value; /* maximum possible (s64)value */ u64 umin_value; /* minimum possible (u64)value */ u64 umax_value; /* maximum possible (u64)value */ + /* Inside the callee two registers can be both PTR_TO_STACK like + * R1=fp-8 and R2=fp-8, but one of them points to this function stack + * while another to the caller's stack. To differentiate them 'frameno' + * is used which is an index in bpf_verifier_state->frame[] array + * pointing to bpf_func_state. + * This field must be second to last, for states_equal() reasons. + */ + u32 frameno; /* This field must be last, for states_equal() reasons. */ enum bpf_reg_liveness live; }; @@ -96,13 +104,34 @@ struct bpf_stack_state { /* state of the program: * type of all registers and stack info */ -struct bpf_verifier_state { +struct bpf_func_state { struct bpf_reg_state regs[MAX_BPF_REG]; struct bpf_verifier_state *parent; + /* index of call instruction that called into this func */ + int callsite; + /* stack frame number of this function state from pov of + * enclosing bpf_verifier_state. + * 0 = main function, 1 = first callee. + */ + u32 frameno; + /* subprog number == index within subprog_stack_depth + * zero == main subprog + */ + u32 subprogno; + + /* should be second to last. See copy_func_state() */ int allocated_stack; struct bpf_stack_state *stack; }; +#define MAX_CALL_FRAMES 8 +struct bpf_verifier_state { + /* call stack tracking */ + struct bpf_func_state *frame[MAX_CALL_FRAMES]; + struct bpf_verifier_state *parent; + u32 curframe; +}; + /* linked list of verifier states used to prune search */ struct bpf_verifier_state_list { struct bpf_verifier_state state; @@ -163,12 +192,15 @@ struct bpf_verifier_env { struct bpf_insn_aux_data *insn_aux_data; /* array of per-insn state */ struct bpf_verifer_log log; u32 subprog_starts[BPF_MAX_SUBPROGS]; + u16 subprog_stack_depth[BPF_MAX_SUBPROGS + 1]; u32 subprog_cnt; }; static inline struct bpf_reg_state *cur_regs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { - return env->cur_state->regs; + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state; + + return cur->frame[cur->curframe]->regs; } #if defined(CONFIG_NET) && defined(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 1d0f7ff0b9a9..f6e09d84a96f 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -229,13 +229,23 @@ static void print_liveness(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, verbose(env, "w"); } +static struct bpf_func_state *func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state; + + return cur->frame[reg->frameno]; +} + static void print_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - struct bpf_verifier_state *state) + const struct bpf_func_state *state) { - struct bpf_reg_state *reg; + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg; enum bpf_reg_type t; int i; + if (state->frameno) + verbose(env, " frame%d:", state->frameno); for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) { reg = &state->regs[i]; t = reg->type; @@ -248,6 +258,8 @@ static void print_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) { /* reg->off should be 0 for SCALAR_VALUE */ verbose(env, "%lld", reg->var_off.value + reg->off); + if (t == PTR_TO_STACK) + verbose(env, ",call_%d", func(env, reg)->callsite); } else { verbose(env, "(id=%d", reg->id); if (t != SCALAR_VALUE) @@ -303,8 +315,8 @@ static void print_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, verbose(env, "\n"); } -static int copy_stack_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst, - const struct bpf_verifier_state *src) +static int copy_stack_state(struct bpf_func_state *dst, + const struct bpf_func_state *src) { if (!src->stack) return 0; @@ -320,13 +332,13 @@ static int copy_stack_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst, /* do_check() starts with zero-sized stack in struct bpf_verifier_state to * make it consume minimal amount of memory. check_stack_write() access from - * the program calls into realloc_verifier_state() to grow the stack size. + * the program calls into realloc_func_state() to grow the stack size. * Note there is a non-zero 'parent' pointer inside bpf_verifier_state * which this function copies over. It points to previous bpf_verifier_state * which is never reallocated */ -static int realloc_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int size, - bool copy_old) +static int realloc_func_state(struct bpf_func_state *state, int size, + bool copy_old) { u32 old_size = state->allocated_stack; struct bpf_stack_state *new_stack; @@ -359,10 +371,21 @@ static int realloc_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int size, return 0; } +static void free_func_state(struct bpf_func_state *state) +{ + kfree(state->stack); + kfree(state); +} + static void free_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, bool free_self) { - kfree(state->stack); + int i; + + for (i = 0; i <= state->curframe; i++) { + free_func_state(state->frame[i]); + state->frame[i] = NULL; + } if (free_self) kfree(state); } @@ -370,18 +393,46 @@ static void free_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, /* copy verifier state from src to dst growing dst stack space * when necessary to accommodate larger src stack */ -static int copy_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst, - const struct bpf_verifier_state *src) +static int copy_func_state(struct bpf_func_state *dst, + const struct bpf_func_state *src) { int err; - err = realloc_verifier_state(dst, src->allocated_stack, false); + err = realloc_func_state(dst, src->allocated_stack, false); if (err) return err; - memcpy(dst, src, offsetof(struct bpf_verifier_state, allocated_stack)); + memcpy(dst, src, offsetof(struct bpf_func_state, allocated_stack)); return copy_stack_state(dst, src); } +static int copy_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst_state, + const struct bpf_verifier_state *src) +{ + struct bpf_func_state *dst; + int i, err; + + /* if dst has more stack frames then src frame, free them */ + for (i = src->curframe + 1; i <= dst_state->curframe; i++) { + free_func_state(dst_state->frame[i]); + dst_state->frame[i] = NULL; + } + dst_state->curframe = src->curframe; + dst_state->parent = src->parent; + for (i = 0; i <= src->curframe; i++) { + dst = dst_state->frame[i]; + if (!dst) { + dst = kzalloc(sizeof(*dst), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!dst) + return -ENOMEM; + dst_state->frame[i] = dst; + } + err = copy_func_state(dst, src->frame[i]); + if (err) + return err; + } + return 0; +} + static int pop_stack(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *prev_insn_idx, int *insn_idx) { @@ -443,6 +494,10 @@ err: static const int caller_saved[CALLER_SAVED_REGS] = { BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_5 }; +#define CALLEE_SAVED_REGS 5 +static const int callee_saved[CALLEE_SAVED_REGS] = { + BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9 +}; static void __mark_reg_not_init(struct bpf_reg_state *reg); @@ -578,6 +633,7 @@ static void __mark_reg_unknown(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) reg->id = 0; reg->off = 0; reg->var_off = tnum_unknown; + reg->frameno = 0; __mark_reg_unbounded(reg); } @@ -614,8 +670,9 @@ static void mark_reg_not_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } static void init_reg_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - struct bpf_reg_state *regs) + struct bpf_func_state *state) { + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs; int i; for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) { @@ -626,12 +683,24 @@ static void init_reg_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, /* frame pointer */ regs[BPF_REG_FP].type = PTR_TO_STACK; mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_FP); + regs[BPF_REG_FP].frameno = state->frameno; /* 1st arg to a function */ regs[BPF_REG_1].type = PTR_TO_CTX; mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_1); } +#define BPF_MAIN_FUNC (-1) +static void init_func_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_func_state *state, + int callsite, int frameno, int subprogno) +{ + state->callsite = callsite; + state->frameno = frameno; + state->subprogno = subprogno; + init_reg_state(env, state); +} + enum reg_arg_type { SRC_OP, /* register is used as source operand */ DST_OP, /* register is used as destination operand */ @@ -745,29 +814,86 @@ next: return 0; } -static void mark_reg_read(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, u32 regno) +struct bpf_verifier_state *skip_callee(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, + struct bpf_verifier_state *parent, + u32 regno) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *parent = state->parent; + struct bpf_verifier_state *tmp = NULL; + + /* 'parent' could be a state of caller and + * 'state' could be a state of callee. In such case + * parent->curframe < state->curframe + * and it's ok for r1 - r5 registers + * + * 'parent' could be a callee's state after it bpf_exit-ed. + * In such case parent->curframe > state->curframe + * and it's ok for r0 only + */ + if (parent->curframe == state->curframe || + (parent->curframe < state->curframe && + regno >= BPF_REG_1 && regno <= BPF_REG_5) || + (parent->curframe > state->curframe && + regno == BPF_REG_0)) + return parent; + + if (parent->curframe > state->curframe && + regno >= BPF_REG_6) { + /* for callee saved regs we have to skip the whole chain + * of states that belong to callee and mark as LIVE_READ + * the registers before the call + */ + tmp = parent; + while (tmp && tmp->curframe != state->curframe) { + tmp = tmp->parent; + } + if (!tmp) + goto bug; + parent = tmp; + } else { + goto bug; + } + return parent; +bug: + verbose(env, "verifier bug regno %d tmp %p\n", regno, tmp); + verbose(env, "regno %d parent frame %d current frame %d\n", + regno, parent->curframe, state->curframe); + return 0; +} + +static int mark_reg_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, + struct bpf_verifier_state *parent, + u32 regno) +{ + bool writes = parent == state->parent; /* Observe write marks */ if (regno == BPF_REG_FP) /* We don't need to worry about FP liveness because it's read-only */ - return; + return 0; while (parent) { /* if read wasn't screened by an earlier write ... */ - if (state->regs[regno].live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN) + if (writes && state->frame[state->curframe]->regs[regno].live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN) break; + parent = skip_callee(env, state, parent, regno); + if (!parent) + return -EFAULT; /* ... then we depend on parent's value */ - parent->regs[regno].live |= REG_LIVE_READ; + parent->frame[parent->curframe]->regs[regno].live |= REG_LIVE_READ; state = parent; parent = state->parent; + writes = true; } + return 0; } static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, enum reg_arg_type t) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state->regs; + struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_func_state *state = vstate->frame[vstate->curframe]; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs; if (regno >= MAX_BPF_REG) { verbose(env, "R%d is invalid\n", regno); @@ -780,7 +906,7 @@ static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, verbose(env, "R%d !read_ok\n", regno); return -EACCES; } - mark_reg_read(env->cur_state, regno); + return mark_reg_read(env, vstate, vstate->parent, regno); } else { /* check whether register used as dest operand can be written to */ if (regno == BPF_REG_FP) { @@ -815,13 +941,15 @@ static bool is_spillable_regtype(enum bpf_reg_type type) * stack boundary and alignment are checked in check_mem_access() */ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, - int size, int value_regno) + struct bpf_func_state *state, /* func where register points to */ + int off, int size, int value_regno) { + struct bpf_func_state *cur; /* state of the current function */ int i, slot = -off - 1, spi = slot / BPF_REG_SIZE, err; + enum bpf_reg_type type; - err = realloc_verifier_state(state, round_up(slot + 1, BPF_REG_SIZE), - true); + err = realloc_func_state(state, round_up(slot + 1, BPF_REG_SIZE), + true); if (err) return err; /* caller checked that off % size == 0 and -MAX_BPF_STACK <= off < 0, @@ -834,8 +962,9 @@ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return -EACCES; } + cur = env->cur_state->frame[env->cur_state->curframe]; if (value_regno >= 0 && - is_spillable_regtype(state->regs[value_regno].type)) { + is_spillable_regtype((type = cur->regs[value_regno].type))) { /* register containing pointer is being spilled into stack */ if (size != BPF_REG_SIZE) { @@ -843,8 +972,13 @@ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return -EACCES; } + if (state != cur && type == PTR_TO_STACK) { + verbose(env, "cannot spill pointers to stack into stack frame of the caller\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + /* save register state */ - state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr = state->regs[value_regno]; + state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr = cur->regs[value_regno]; state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) @@ -860,34 +994,68 @@ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return 0; } -static void mark_stack_slot_read(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int slot) +/* registers of every function are unique and mark_reg_read() propagates + * the liveness in the following cases: + * - from callee into caller for R1 - R5 that were used as arguments + * - from caller into callee for R0 that used as result of the call + * - from caller to the same caller skipping states of the callee for R6 - R9, + * since R6 - R9 are callee saved by implicit function prologue and + * caller's R6 != callee's R6, so when we propagate liveness up to + * parent states we need to skip callee states for R6 - R9. + * + * stack slot marking is different, since stacks of caller and callee are + * accessible in both (since caller can pass a pointer to caller's stack to + * callee which can pass it to another function), hence mark_stack_slot_read() + * has to propagate the stack liveness to all parent states at given frame number. + * Consider code: + * f1() { + * ptr = fp - 8; + * *ptr = ctx; + * call f2 { + * .. = *ptr; + * } + * .. = *ptr; + * } + * First *ptr is reading from f1's stack and mark_stack_slot_read() has + * to mark liveness at the f1's frame and not f2's frame. + * Second *ptr is also reading from f1's stack and mark_stack_slot_read() has + * to propagate liveness to f2 states at f1's frame level and further into + * f1 states at f1's frame level until write into that stack slot + */ +static void mark_stack_slot_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, + struct bpf_verifier_state *parent, + int slot, int frameno) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *parent = state->parent; + bool writes = parent == state->parent; /* Observe write marks */ while (parent) { /* if read wasn't screened by an earlier write ... */ - if (state->stack[slot].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN) + if (writes && state->frame[frameno]->stack[slot].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN) break; /* ... then we depend on parent's value */ - parent->stack[slot].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_READ; + parent->frame[frameno]->stack[slot].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_READ; state = parent; parent = state->parent; + writes = true; } } static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, int size, - int value_regno) + struct bpf_func_state *reg_state /* func where register points to */, + int off, int size, int value_regno) { + struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_func_state *state = vstate->frame[vstate->curframe]; int i, slot = -off - 1, spi = slot / BPF_REG_SIZE; u8 *stype; - if (state->allocated_stack <= slot) { + if (reg_state->allocated_stack <= slot) { verbose(env, "invalid read from stack off %d+0 size %d\n", off, size); return -EACCES; } - stype = state->stack[spi].slot_type; + stype = reg_state->stack[spi].slot_type; if (stype[0] == STACK_SPILL) { if (size != BPF_REG_SIZE) { @@ -903,13 +1071,14 @@ static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, if (value_regno >= 0) { /* restore register state from stack */ - state->regs[value_regno] = state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr; + state->regs[value_regno] = reg_state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr; /* mark reg as written since spilled pointer state likely * has its liveness marks cleared by is_state_visited() * which resets stack/reg liveness for state transitions */ state->regs[value_regno].live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; - mark_stack_slot_read(state, spi); + mark_stack_slot_read(env, vstate, vstate->parent, spi, + reg_state->frameno); } return 0; } else { @@ -947,7 +1116,8 @@ static int __check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, static int check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, int size, bool zero_size_allowed) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_func_state *state = vstate->frame[vstate->curframe]; struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &state->regs[regno]; int err; @@ -1197,6 +1367,39 @@ static int check_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, strict); } +static int update_stack_depth(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + const struct bpf_func_state *func, + int off) +{ + u16 stack = env->subprog_stack_depth[func->subprogno], total = 0; + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state; + int i; + + if (stack >= -off) + return 0; + + /* update known max for given subprogram */ + env->subprog_stack_depth[func->subprogno] = -off; + + /* compute the total for current call chain */ + for (i = 0; i <= cur->curframe; i++) { + u32 depth = env->subprog_stack_depth[cur->frame[i]->subprogno]; + + /* round up to 32-bytes, since this is granularity + * of interpreter stack sizes + */ + depth = round_up(depth, 32); + total += depth; + } + + if (total > MAX_BPF_STACK) { + verbose(env, "combined stack size of %d calls is %d. Too large\n", + cur->curframe, total); + return -EACCES; + } + return 0; +} + /* check whether memory at (regno + off) is accessible for t = (read | write) * if t==write, value_regno is a register which value is stored into memory * if t==read, value_regno is a register which will receive the value from memory @@ -1207,9 +1410,9 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn int bpf_size, enum bpf_access_type t, int value_regno) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); struct bpf_reg_state *reg = regs + regno; + struct bpf_func_state *state; int size, err = 0; size = bpf_size_to_bytes(bpf_size); @@ -1298,8 +1501,10 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn return -EACCES; } - if (env->prog->aux->stack_depth < -off) - env->prog->aux->stack_depth = -off; + state = func(env, reg); + err = update_stack_depth(env, state, off); + if (err) + return err; if (t == BPF_WRITE) err = check_stack_write(env, state, off, size, @@ -1390,7 +1595,7 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta) { struct bpf_reg_state *reg = cur_regs(env) + regno; - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg); int off, i, slot, spi; if (reg->type != PTR_TO_STACK) { @@ -1421,9 +1626,6 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, return -EACCES; } - if (env->prog->aux->stack_depth < -off) - env->prog->aux->stack_depth = -off; - if (meta && meta->raw_mode) { meta->access_size = access_size; meta->regno = regno; @@ -1441,7 +1643,7 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, return -EACCES; } } - return 0; + return update_stack_depth(env, state, off); } static int check_helper_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, @@ -1694,6 +1896,10 @@ static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, case BPF_FUNC_tail_call: if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY) goto error; + if (env->subprog_cnt) { + verbose(env, "tail_calls are not allowed in programs with bpf-to-bpf calls\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } break; case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read: case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output: @@ -1755,9 +1961,9 @@ static int check_raw_mode(const struct bpf_func_proto *fn) /* Packet data might have moved, any old PTR_TO_PACKET[_META,_END] * are now invalid, so turn them into unknown SCALAR_VALUE. */ -static void clear_all_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) +static void __clear_all_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_func_state *state) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs, *reg; int i; @@ -1774,7 +1980,121 @@ static void clear_all_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) } } -static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx) +static void clear_all_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) +{ + struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate = env->cur_state; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i <= vstate->curframe; i++) + __clear_all_pkt_pointers(env, vstate->frame[i]); +} + +static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn, + int *insn_idx) +{ + struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_func_state *caller, *callee; + int i, subprog, target_insn; + + if (state->curframe >= MAX_CALL_FRAMES) { + verbose(env, "the call stack of %d frames is too deep\n", + state->curframe); + return -E2BIG; + } + + target_insn = *insn_idx + insn->imm; + subprog = find_subprog(env, target_insn + 1); + if (subprog < 0) { + verbose(env, "verifier bug. No program starts at insn %d\n", + target_insn + 1); + return -EFAULT; + } + + caller = state->frame[state->curframe]; + if (state->frame[state->curframe + 1]) { + verbose(env, "verifier bug. Frame %d already allocated\n", + state->curframe + 1); + return -EFAULT; + } + + callee = kzalloc(sizeof(*callee), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!callee) + return -ENOMEM; + state->frame[state->curframe + 1] = callee; + + /* callee cannot access r0, r6 - r9 for reading and has to write + * into its own stack before reading from it. + * callee can read/write into caller's stack + */ + init_func_state(env, callee, + /* remember the callsite, it will be used by bpf_exit */ + *insn_idx /* callsite */, + state->curframe + 1 /* frameno within this callchain */, + subprog + 1 /* subprog number within this prog */); + + /* copy r1 - r5 args that callee can access */ + for (i = BPF_REG_1; i <= BPF_REG_5; i++) + callee->regs[i] = caller->regs[i]; + + /* after the call regsiters r0 - r5 were scratched */ + for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) { + mark_reg_not_init(env, caller->regs, caller_saved[i]); + check_reg_arg(env, caller_saved[i], DST_OP_NO_MARK); + } + + /* only increment it after check_reg_arg() finished */ + state->curframe++; + + /* and go analyze first insn of the callee */ + *insn_idx = target_insn; + + if (env->log.level) { + verbose(env, "caller:\n"); + print_verifier_state(env, caller); + verbose(env, "callee:\n"); + print_verifier_state(env, callee); + } + return 0; +} + +static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx) +{ + struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_func_state *caller, *callee; + struct bpf_reg_state *r0; + + callee = state->frame[state->curframe]; + r0 = &callee->regs[BPF_REG_0]; + if (r0->type == PTR_TO_STACK) { + /* technically it's ok to return caller's stack pointer + * (or caller's caller's pointer) back to the caller, + * since these pointers are valid. Only current stack + * pointer will be invalid as soon as function exits, + * but let's be conservative + */ + verbose(env, "cannot return stack pointer to the caller\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + state->curframe--; + caller = state->frame[state->curframe]; + /* return to the caller whatever r0 had in the callee */ + caller->regs[BPF_REG_0] = *r0; + + *insn_idx = callee->callsite + 1; + if (env->log.level) { + verbose(env, "returning from callee:\n"); + print_verifier_state(env, callee); + verbose(env, "to caller at %d:\n", *insn_idx); + print_verifier_state(env, caller); + } + /* clear everything in the callee */ + free_func_state(callee); + state->frame[state->curframe + 1] = NULL; + return 0; +} + +static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx) { const struct bpf_func_proto *fn = NULL; struct bpf_reg_state *regs; @@ -1934,7 +2254,9 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg, const struct bpf_reg_state *off_reg) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *dst_reg; + struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_func_state *state = vstate->frame[vstate->curframe]; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs, *dst_reg; bool known = tnum_is_const(off_reg->var_off); s64 smin_val = off_reg->smin_value, smax_val = off_reg->smax_value, smin_ptr = ptr_reg->smin_value, smax_ptr = ptr_reg->smax_value; @@ -1946,13 +2268,13 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, dst_reg = ®s[dst]; if (WARN_ON_ONCE(known && (smin_val != smax_val))) { - print_verifier_state(env, env->cur_state); + print_verifier_state(env, state); verbose(env, "verifier internal error: known but bad sbounds\n"); return -EINVAL; } if (WARN_ON_ONCE(known && (umin_val != umax_val))) { - print_verifier_state(env, env->cur_state); + print_verifier_state(env, state); verbose(env, "verifier internal error: known but bad ubounds\n"); return -EINVAL; @@ -2354,7 +2676,9 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, static int adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *dst_reg, *src_reg; + struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_func_state *state = vstate->frame[vstate->curframe]; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs, *dst_reg, *src_reg; struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg = NULL, off_reg = {0}; u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); int rc; @@ -2428,12 +2752,12 @@ static int adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, /* Got here implies adding two SCALAR_VALUEs */ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ptr_reg)) { - print_verifier_state(env, env->cur_state); + print_verifier_state(env, state); verbose(env, "verifier internal error: unexpected ptr_reg\n"); return -EINVAL; } if (WARN_ON(!src_reg)) { - print_verifier_state(env, env->cur_state); + print_verifier_state(env, state); verbose(env, "verifier internal error: no src_reg\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -2587,14 +2911,15 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) return 0; } -static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, +static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate, struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg, enum bpf_reg_type type, bool range_right_open) { + struct bpf_func_state *state = vstate->frame[vstate->curframe]; struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs, *reg; u16 new_range; - int i; + int i, j; if (dst_reg->off < 0 || (dst_reg->off == 0 && range_right_open)) @@ -2664,12 +2989,15 @@ static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, /* keep the maximum range already checked */ regs[i].range = max(regs[i].range, new_range); - for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { - if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) - continue; - reg = &state->stack[i].spilled_ptr; - if (reg->type == type && reg->id == dst_reg->id) - reg->range = max(reg->range, new_range); + for (j = 0; j <= vstate->curframe; j++) { + state = vstate->frame[j]; + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) + continue; + reg = &state->stack[i].spilled_ptr; + if (reg->type == type && reg->id == dst_reg->id) + reg->range = max(reg->range, new_range); + } } } @@ -2907,20 +3235,24 @@ static void mark_map_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, u32 id, /* The logic is similar to find_good_pkt_pointers(), both could eventually * be folded together at some point. */ -static void mark_map_regs(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, u32 regno, +static void mark_map_regs(struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate, u32 regno, bool is_null) { + struct bpf_func_state *state = vstate->frame[vstate->curframe]; struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs; u32 id = regs[regno].id; - int i; + int i, j; for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) mark_map_reg(regs, i, id, is_null); - for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { - if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) - continue; - mark_map_reg(&state->stack[i].spilled_ptr, 0, id, is_null); + for (j = 0; j <= vstate->curframe; j++) { + state = vstate->frame[j]; + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) + continue; + mark_map_reg(&state->stack[i].spilled_ptr, 0, id, is_null); + } } } @@ -3020,8 +3352,10 @@ static bool try_match_pkt_pointers(const struct bpf_insn *insn, static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn, int *insn_idx) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *other_branch, *this_branch = env->cur_state; - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = this_branch->regs, *dst_reg; + struct bpf_verifier_state *this_branch = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *other_branch; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = this_branch->frame[this_branch->curframe]->regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg, *other_branch_regs; u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); int err; @@ -3084,6 +3418,7 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, other_branch = push_stack(env, *insn_idx + insn->off + 1, *insn_idx); if (!other_branch) return -EFAULT; + other_branch_regs = other_branch->frame[other_branch->curframe]->regs; /* detect if we are comparing against a constant value so we can adjust * our min/max values for our dst register. @@ -3096,22 +3431,22 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, if (dst_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && regs[insn->src_reg].type == SCALAR_VALUE) { if (tnum_is_const(regs[insn->src_reg].var_off)) - reg_set_min_max(&other_branch->regs[insn->dst_reg], + reg_set_min_max(&other_branch_regs[insn->dst_reg], dst_reg, regs[insn->src_reg].var_off.value, opcode); else if (tnum_is_const(dst_reg->var_off)) - reg_set_min_max_inv(&other_branch->regs[insn->src_reg], + reg_set_min_max_inv(&other_branch_regs[insn->src_reg], ®s[insn->src_reg], dst_reg->var_off.value, opcode); else if (opcode == BPF_JEQ || opcode == BPF_JNE) /* Comparing for equality, we can combine knowledge */ - reg_combine_min_max(&other_branch->regs[insn->src_reg], - &other_branch->regs[insn->dst_reg], + reg_combine_min_max(&other_branch_regs[insn->src_reg], + &other_branch_regs[insn->dst_reg], ®s[insn->src_reg], ®s[insn->dst_reg], opcode); } } else if (dst_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE) { - reg_set_min_max(&other_branch->regs[insn->dst_reg], + reg_set_min_max(&other_branch_regs[insn->dst_reg], dst_reg, insn->imm, opcode); } @@ -3132,7 +3467,7 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return -EACCES; } if (env->log.level) - print_verifier_state(env, this_branch); + print_verifier_state(env, this_branch->frame[this_branch->curframe]); return 0; } @@ -3217,6 +3552,18 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) return -EINVAL; } + if (env->subprog_cnt) { + /* when program has LD_ABS insn JITs and interpreter assume + * that r1 == ctx == skb which is not the case for callees + * that can have arbitrary arguments. It's problematic + * for main prog as well since JITs would need to analyze + * all functions in order to make proper register save/restore + * decisions in the main prog. Hence disallow LD_ABS with calls + */ + verbose(env, "BPF_LD_[ABS|IND] instructions cannot be mixed with bpf-to-bpf calls\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (insn->dst_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off != 0 || BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW || (mode == BPF_ABS && insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0)) { @@ -3555,11 +3902,21 @@ static bool check_ids(u32 old_id, u32 cur_id, struct idpair *idmap) static bool regsafe(struct bpf_reg_state *rold, struct bpf_reg_state *rcur, struct idpair *idmap) { + bool equal; + if (!(rold->live & REG_LIVE_READ)) /* explored state didn't use this */ return true; - if (memcmp(rold, rcur, offsetof(struct bpf_reg_state, live)) == 0) + equal = memcmp(rold, rcur, offsetof(struct bpf_reg_state, frameno)) == 0; + + if (rold->type == PTR_TO_STACK) + /* two stack pointers are equal only if they're pointing to + * the same stack frame, since fp-8 in foo != fp-8 in bar + */ + return equal && rold->frameno == rcur->frameno; + + if (equal) return true; if (rold->type == NOT_INIT) @@ -3632,7 +3989,6 @@ static bool regsafe(struct bpf_reg_state *rold, struct bpf_reg_state *rcur, tnum_in(rold->var_off, rcur->var_off); case PTR_TO_CTX: case CONST_PTR_TO_MAP: - case PTR_TO_STACK: case PTR_TO_PACKET_END: /* Only valid matches are exact, which memcmp() above * would have accepted @@ -3647,8 +4003,8 @@ static bool regsafe(struct bpf_reg_state *rold, struct bpf_reg_state *rcur, return false; } -static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_verifier_state *old, - struct bpf_verifier_state *cur, +static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_func_state *old, + struct bpf_func_state *cur, struct idpair *idmap) { int i, spi; @@ -3724,9 +4080,8 @@ static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_verifier_state *old, * whereas register type in current state is meaningful, it means that * the current state will reach 'bpf_exit' instruction safely */ -static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - struct bpf_verifier_state *old, - struct bpf_verifier_state *cur) +static bool func_states_equal(struct bpf_func_state *old, + struct bpf_func_state *cur) { struct idpair *idmap; bool ret = false; @@ -3750,71 +4105,76 @@ out_free: return ret; } +static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_verifier_state *old, + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur) +{ + int i; + + if (old->curframe != cur->curframe) + return false; + + /* for states to be equal callsites have to be the same + * and all frame states need to be equivalent + */ + for (i = 0; i <= old->curframe; i++) { + if (old->frame[i]->callsite != cur->frame[i]->callsite) + return false; + if (!func_states_equal(old->frame[i], cur->frame[i])) + return false; + } + return true; +} + /* A write screens off any subsequent reads; but write marks come from the - * straight-line code between a state and its parent. When we arrive at a - * jump target (in the first iteration of the propagate_liveness() loop), - * we didn't arrive by the straight-line code, so read marks in state must - * propagate to parent regardless of state's write marks. + * straight-line code between a state and its parent. When we arrive at an + * equivalent state (jump target or such) we didn't arrive by the straight-line + * code, so read marks in the state must propagate to the parent regardless + * of the state's write marks. That's what 'parent == state->parent' comparison + * in mark_reg_read() and mark_stack_slot_read() is for. */ -static bool do_propagate_liveness(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, - struct bpf_verifier_state *parent) +static int propagate_liveness(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + const struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate, + struct bpf_verifier_state *vparent) { - bool writes = parent == state->parent; /* Observe write marks */ - bool touched = false; /* any changes made? */ - int i; + int i, frame, err = 0; + struct bpf_func_state *state, *parent; - if (!parent) - return touched; + if (vparent->curframe != vstate->curframe) { + WARN(1, "propagate_live: parent frame %d current frame %d\n", + vparent->curframe, vstate->curframe); + return -EFAULT; + } /* Propagate read liveness of registers... */ BUILD_BUG_ON(BPF_REG_FP + 1 != MAX_BPF_REG); /* We don't need to worry about FP liveness because it's read-only */ for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_FP; i++) { - if (parent->regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ) + if (vparent->frame[vparent->curframe]->regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ) continue; - if (writes && (state->regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN)) - continue; - if (state->regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ) { - parent->regs[i].live |= REG_LIVE_READ; - touched = true; + if (vstate->frame[vstate->curframe]->regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ) { + err = mark_reg_read(env, vstate, vparent, i); + if (err) + return err; } } + /* ... and stack slots */ - for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE && - i < parent->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { - if (parent->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) - continue; - if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) - continue; - if (parent->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_READ) - continue; - if (writes && - (state->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN)) - continue; - if (state->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_READ) { - parent->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_READ; - touched = true; + for (frame = 0; frame <= vstate->curframe; frame++) { + state = vstate->frame[frame]; + parent = vparent->frame[frame]; + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE && + i < parent->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (parent->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) + continue; + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) + continue; + if (parent->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_READ) + continue; + if (state->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_READ) + mark_stack_slot_read(env, vstate, vparent, i, frame); } } - return touched; -} - -/* "parent" is "a state from which we reach the current state", but initially - * it is not the state->parent (i.e. "the state whose straight-line code leads - * to the current state"), instead it is the state that happened to arrive at - * a (prunable) equivalent of the current state. See comment above - * do_propagate_liveness() for consequences of this. - * This function is just a more efficient way of calling mark_reg_read() or - * mark_stack_slot_read() on each reg in "parent" that is read in "state", - * though it requires that parent != state->parent in the call arguments. - */ -static void propagate_liveness(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, - struct bpf_verifier_state *parent) -{ - while (do_propagate_liveness(state, parent)) { - /* Something changed, so we need to feed those changes onward */ - state = parent; - parent = state->parent; - } + return err; } static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) @@ -3822,7 +4182,7 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) struct bpf_verifier_state_list *new_sl; struct bpf_verifier_state_list *sl; struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state; - int i, err; + int i, j, err; sl = env->explored_states[insn_idx]; if (!sl) @@ -3843,7 +4203,9 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) * they'll be immediately forgotten as we're pruning * this state and will pop a new one. */ - propagate_liveness(&sl->state, cur); + err = propagate_liveness(env, &sl->state, cur); + if (err) + return err; return 1; } sl = sl->next; @@ -3851,9 +4213,10 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) /* there were no equivalent states, remember current one. * technically the current state is not proven to be safe yet, - * but it will either reach bpf_exit (which means it's safe) or - * it will be rejected. Since there are no loops, we won't be - * seeing this 'insn_idx' instruction again on the way to bpf_exit + * but it will either reach outer most bpf_exit (which means it's safe) + * or it will be rejected. Since there are no loops, we won't be + * seeing this tuple (frame[0].callsite, frame[1].callsite, .. insn_idx) + * again on the way to bpf_exit */ new_sl = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state_list), GFP_KERNEL); if (!new_sl) @@ -3877,10 +4240,16 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) * explored_states can get read marks.) */ for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_FP; i++) - cur->regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE; - for (i = 0; i < cur->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) - if (cur->stack[i].slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL) - cur->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live = REG_LIVE_NONE; + cur->frame[cur->curframe]->regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE; + + /* all stack frames are accessible from callee, clear them all */ + for (j = 0; j <= cur->curframe; j++) { + struct bpf_func_state *frame = cur->frame[j]; + + for (i = 0; i < frame->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) + if (frame->stack[i].slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL) + frame->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live = REG_LIVE_NONE; + } return 0; } @@ -3898,7 +4267,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) struct bpf_verifier_state *state; struct bpf_insn *insns = env->prog->insnsi; struct bpf_reg_state *regs; - int insn_cnt = env->prog->len; + int insn_cnt = env->prog->len, i; int insn_idx, prev_insn_idx = 0; int insn_processed = 0; bool do_print_state = false; @@ -3906,9 +4275,18 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) state = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state), GFP_KERNEL); if (!state) return -ENOMEM; - env->cur_state = state; - init_reg_state(env, state->regs); + state->curframe = 0; state->parent = NULL; + state->frame[0] = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_func_state), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!state->frame[0]) { + kfree(state); + return -ENOMEM; + } + env->cur_state = state; + init_func_state(env, state->frame[0], + BPF_MAIN_FUNC /* callsite */, + 0 /* frameno */, + 0 /* subprogno, zero == main subprog */); insn_idx = 0; for (;;) { struct bpf_insn *insn; @@ -3955,7 +4333,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) else verbose(env, "\nfrom %d to %d:", prev_insn_idx, insn_idx); - print_verifier_state(env, state); + print_verifier_state(env, state->frame[state->curframe]); do_print_state = false; } @@ -4088,13 +4466,17 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (opcode == BPF_CALL) { if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) != BPF_K || insn->off != 0 || - insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || + (insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 && + insn->src_reg != BPF_PSEUDO_CALL) || insn->dst_reg != BPF_REG_0) { verbose(env, "BPF_CALL uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } - err = check_call(env, insn->imm, insn_idx); + if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL) + err = check_func_call(env, insn, &insn_idx); + else + err = check_helper_call(env, insn->imm, insn_idx); if (err) return err; @@ -4119,6 +4501,16 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return -EINVAL; } + if (state->curframe) { + /* exit from nested function */ + prev_insn_idx = insn_idx; + err = prepare_func_exit(env, &insn_idx); + if (err) + return err; + do_print_state = true; + continue; + } + /* eBPF calling convetion is such that R0 is used * to return the value from eBPF program. * Make sure that it's readable at this time @@ -4179,8 +4571,16 @@ process_bpf_exit: insn_idx++; } - verbose(env, "processed %d insns, stack depth %d\n", insn_processed, - env->prog->aux->stack_depth); + verbose(env, "processed %d insns, stack depth ", insn_processed); + for (i = 0; i < env->subprog_cnt + 1; i++) { + u32 depth = env->subprog_stack_depth[i]; + + verbose(env, "%d", depth); + if (i + 1 < env->subprog_cnt + 1) + verbose(env, "+"); + } + verbose(env, "\n"); + env->prog->aux->stack_depth = env->subprog_stack_depth[0]; return 0; } |
