diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/ntfs/file.c | 16 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/ntfs/mft.c | 13 |
2 files changed, 10 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ntfs/file.c b/fs/ntfs/file.c index 3140a4429af1..4350d4993b18 100644 --- a/fs/ntfs/file.c +++ b/fs/ntfs/file.c @@ -2076,14 +2076,6 @@ err_out: *ppos = pos; if (cached_page) page_cache_release(cached_page); - /* For now, when the user asks for O_SYNC, we actually give O_DSYNC. */ - if (likely(!status)) { - if (unlikely((file->f_flags & O_SYNC) || IS_SYNC(vi))) { - if (!mapping->a_ops->writepage || !is_sync_kiocb(iocb)) - status = generic_osync_inode(vi, mapping, - OSYNC_METADATA|OSYNC_DATA); - } - } pagevec_lru_add_file(&lru_pvec); ntfs_debug("Done. Returning %s (written 0x%lx, status %li).", written ? "written" : "status", (unsigned long)written, @@ -2145,8 +2137,8 @@ static ssize_t ntfs_file_aio_write(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov, mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex); ret = ntfs_file_aio_write_nolock(iocb, iov, nr_segs, &iocb->ki_pos); mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex); - if (ret > 0 && ((file->f_flags & O_SYNC) || IS_SYNC(inode))) { - int err = sync_page_range(inode, mapping, pos, ret); + if (ret > 0) { + int err = generic_write_sync(file, pos, ret); if (err < 0) ret = err; } @@ -2173,8 +2165,8 @@ static ssize_t ntfs_file_writev(struct file *file, const struct iovec *iov, if (ret == -EIOCBQUEUED) ret = wait_on_sync_kiocb(&kiocb); mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex); - if (ret > 0 && ((file->f_flags & O_SYNC) || IS_SYNC(inode))) { - int err = sync_page_range(inode, mapping, *ppos - ret, ret); + if (ret > 0) { + int err = generic_write_sync(file, *ppos - ret, ret); if (err < 0) ret = err; } diff --git a/fs/ntfs/mft.c b/fs/ntfs/mft.c index 23bf68453d7d..1caa0ef0b2bb 100644 --- a/fs/ntfs/mft.c +++ b/fs/ntfs/mft.c @@ -384,13 +384,12 @@ unm_err_out: * it is dirty in the inode meta data rather than the data page cache of the * inode, and thus there are no data pages that need writing out. Therefore, a * full mark_inode_dirty() is overkill. A mark_inode_dirty_sync(), on the - * other hand, is not sufficient, because I_DIRTY_DATASYNC needs to be set to - * ensure ->write_inode is called from generic_osync_inode() and this needs to - * happen or the file data would not necessarily hit the device synchronously, - * even though the vfs inode has the O_SYNC flag set. Also, I_DIRTY_DATASYNC - * simply "feels" better than just I_DIRTY_SYNC, since the file data has not - * actually hit the block device yet, which is not what I_DIRTY_SYNC on its own - * would suggest. + * other hand, is not sufficient, because ->write_inode needs to be called even + * in case of fdatasync. This needs to happen or the file data would not + * necessarily hit the device synchronously, even though the vfs inode has the + * O_SYNC flag set. Also, I_DIRTY_DATASYNC simply "feels" better than just + * I_DIRTY_SYNC, since the file data has not actually hit the block device yet, + * which is not what I_DIRTY_SYNC on its own would suggest. */ void __mark_mft_record_dirty(ntfs_inode *ni) { |
