ASoC: Rename soc_enum.max field with items

The name "max" in struct soc_enum is rather confusing since it
actually takes the number of items.  With "max", one might try to
assign (nitems - 1) value.

Rename the field to a more appropriate one, "items", which is also
used in struct snd_ctl_elem_info, too.

This patch also rewrites some code like "if (x > e->nitems - 1)" with
"if (x >= e->nitems)".  Not only the latter improves the readability,
it also fixes a potential bug when e->items is zero.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
index dc8ff13187f7..2026a64a0afb 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static void dapm_set_path_status(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
 		soc_widget_read(w, e->reg, &val);
 		item = (val >> e->shift_l) & e->mask;
 
-		if (item < e->max && !strcmp(p->name, e->texts[item]))
+		if (item < e->items && !strcmp(p->name, e->texts[item]))
 			p->connect = 1;
 		else
 			p->connect = 0;
@@ -563,12 +563,12 @@ static void dapm_set_path_status(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
 
 		soc_widget_read(w, e->reg, &val);
 		val = (val >> e->shift_l) & e->mask;
-		for (item = 0; item < e->max; item++) {
+		for (item = 0; item < e->items; item++) {
 			if (val == e->values[item])
 				break;
 		}
 
-		if (item < e->max && !strcmp(p->name, e->texts[item]))
+		if (item < e->items && !strcmp(p->name, e->texts[item]))
 			p->connect = 1;
 		else
 			p->connect = 0;
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static int dapm_connect_mux(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
 	struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < e->max; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < e->items; i++) {
 		if (!(strcmp(control_name, e->texts[i]))) {
 			list_add(&path->list, &dapm->card->paths);
 			list_add(&path->list_sink, &dest->sources);
@@ -2967,13 +2967,13 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	struct snd_soc_dapm_update update;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] > e->max - 1)
+	if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->items)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	mux = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
 	val = mux << e->shift_l;
 	mask = e->mask << e->shift_l;
 	if (e->shift_l != e->shift_r) {
-		if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[1] > e->max - 1)
+		if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[1] >= e->items)
 			return -EINVAL;
 		val |= ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[1] << e->shift_r;
 		mask |= e->mask << e->shift_r;
@@ -3036,7 +3036,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	int change;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->max)
+	if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->items)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	mutex_lock_nested(&card->dapm_mutex, SND_SOC_DAPM_CLASS_RUNTIME);
@@ -3077,14 +3077,14 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_get_value_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 
 	reg_val = snd_soc_read(codec, e->reg);
 	val = (reg_val >> e->shift_l) & e->mask;
-	for (mux = 0; mux < e->max; mux++) {
+	for (mux = 0; mux < e->items; mux++) {
 		if (val == e->values[mux])
 			break;
 	}
 	ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] = mux;
 	if (e->shift_l != e->shift_r) {
 		val = (reg_val >> e->shift_r) & e->mask;
-		for (mux = 0; mux < e->max; mux++) {
+		for (mux = 0; mux < e->items; mux++) {
 			if (val == e->values[mux])
 				break;
 		}
@@ -3119,13 +3119,13 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	struct snd_soc_dapm_update update;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] > e->max - 1)
+	if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->items)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	mux = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
 	val = e->values[ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]] << e->shift_l;
 	mask = e->mask << e->shift_l;
 	if (e->shift_l != e->shift_r) {
-		if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[1] > e->max - 1)
+		if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[1] >= e->items)
 			return -EINVAL;
 		val |= e->values[ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[1]] << e->shift_r;
 		mask |= e->mask << e->shift_r;