diff options
author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2013-11-04 13:48:30 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2013-11-04 13:48:30 -0500 |
commit | 394efd19d5fcae936261bd48e5b33b21897aacf8 (patch) | |
tree | c48cf3ddbb07fd87309f1abdf31a27c71330e587 /mm/memcontrol.c | |
parent | f421436a591d34fa5279b54a96ac07d70250cc8d (diff) | |
parent | be408cd3e1fef73e9408b196a79b9934697fe3b1 (diff) | |
download | blackbird-op-linux-394efd19d5fcae936261bd48e5b33b21897aacf8.tar.gz blackbird-op-linux-394efd19d5fcae936261bd48e5b33b21897aacf8.zip |
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net
Conflicts:
drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be.h
drivers/net/netconsole.c
net/bridge/br_private.h
Three mostly trivial conflicts.
The net/bridge/br_private.h conflict was a function signature (argument
addition) change overlapping with the extern removals from Joe Perches.
In drivers/net/netconsole.c we had one change adjusting a printk message
whilst another changed "printk(KERN_INFO" into "pr_info(".
Lastly, the emulex change was a new inline function addition overlapping
with Joe Perches's extern removals.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/memcontrol.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/memcontrol.c | 57 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 31 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 9c9c685e4ddc..665dcd7abfff 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ #include <linux/page_cgroup.h> #include <linux/cpu.h> #include <linux/oom.h> +#include <linux/lockdep.h> #include "internal.h" #include <net/sock.h> #include <net/ip.h> @@ -2046,6 +2047,12 @@ static int mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg, return total; } +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP +static struct lockdep_map memcg_oom_lock_dep_map = { + .name = "memcg_oom_lock", +}; +#endif + static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(memcg_oom_lock); /* @@ -2083,7 +2090,8 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_oom_trylock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) } iter->oom_lock = false; } - } + } else + mutex_acquire(&memcg_oom_lock_dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_); spin_unlock(&memcg_oom_lock); @@ -2095,6 +2103,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_oom_unlock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) struct mem_cgroup *iter; spin_lock(&memcg_oom_lock); + mutex_release(&memcg_oom_lock_dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_); for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg) iter->oom_lock = false; spin_unlock(&memcg_oom_lock); @@ -2765,10 +2774,10 @@ done: *ptr = memcg; return 0; nomem: - *ptr = NULL; - if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) - return 0; - return -ENOMEM; + if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)) { + *ptr = NULL; + return -ENOMEM; + } bypass: *ptr = root_mem_cgroup; return -EINTR; @@ -3773,8 +3782,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_move_account_page_stat(struct mem_cgroup *from, { /* Update stat data for mem_cgroup */ preempt_disable(); - WARN_ON_ONCE(from->stat->count[idx] < nr_pages); - __this_cpu_add(from->stat->count[idx], -nr_pages); + __this_cpu_sub(from->stat->count[idx], nr_pages); __this_cpu_add(to->stat->count[idx], nr_pages); preempt_enable(); } @@ -4950,31 +4958,18 @@ static void mem_cgroup_reparent_charges(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) } while (usage > 0); } -/* - * This mainly exists for tests during the setting of set of use_hierarchy. - * Since this is the very setting we are changing, the current hierarchy value - * is meaningless - */ -static inline bool __memcg_has_children(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) -{ - struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos; - - /* bounce at first found */ - css_for_each_child(pos, &memcg->css) - return true; - return false; -} - -/* - * Must be called with memcg_create_mutex held, unless the cgroup is guaranteed - * to be already dead (as in mem_cgroup_force_empty, for instance). This is - * from mem_cgroup_count_children(), in the sense that we don't really care how - * many children we have; we only need to know if we have any. It also counts - * any memcg without hierarchy as infertile. - */ static inline bool memcg_has_children(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { - return memcg->use_hierarchy && __memcg_has_children(memcg); + lockdep_assert_held(&memcg_create_mutex); + /* + * The lock does not prevent addition or deletion to the list + * of children, but it prevents a new child from being + * initialized based on this parent in css_online(), so it's + * enough to decide whether hierarchically inherited + * attributes can still be changed or not. + */ + return memcg->use_hierarchy && + !list_empty(&memcg->css.cgroup->children); } /* @@ -5054,7 +5049,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchy_write(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, */ if ((!parent_memcg || !parent_memcg->use_hierarchy) && (val == 1 || val == 0)) { - if (!__memcg_has_children(memcg)) + if (list_empty(&memcg->css.cgroup->children)) memcg->use_hierarchy = val; else retval = -EBUSY; |