diff options
| author | Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> | 2011-05-26 14:21:33 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2011-05-28 17:02:55 +0200 |
| commit | d6aa8f85f16379d42c147b22b59e33b67f9ff466 (patch) | |
| tree | 7e28fec1b4d23f5a60fb3370dd446b36aff66379 /kernel/sched.c | |
| parent | cd4ae6adf8b1c21d88e83ed56afeeef97b28f356 (diff) | |
| download | blackbird-op-linux-d6aa8f85f16379d42c147b22b59e33b67f9ff466.tar.gz blackbird-op-linux-d6aa8f85f16379d42c147b22b59e33b67f9ff466.zip | |
sched: Fix ttwu() for __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
Marc reported that e4a52bcb9 (sched: Remove rq->lock from the first
half of ttwu()) broke his ARM-SMP machine. Now ARM is one of the few
__ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW users, so that exception in the ttwu()
code was suspect.
Yong found that the interrupt could hit after context_switch() changes
current but before it clears p->on_cpu, if that interrupt were to
attempt a wake-up of p we would indeed find ourselves spinning in IRQ
context.
Fix this by reverting to the old behaviour for this situation and
perform a full remote wake-up.
Cc: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched.c | 37 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index 5e43e9dc65d1..a80ee911900e 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -2573,7 +2573,26 @@ static void ttwu_queue_remote(struct task_struct *p, int cpu) if (!next) smp_send_reschedule(cpu); } -#endif + +#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW +static int ttwu_activate_remote(struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags) +{ + struct rq *rq; + int ret = 0; + + rq = __task_rq_lock(p); + if (p->on_cpu) { + ttwu_activate(rq, p, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP); + ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, wake_flags); + ret = 1; + } + __task_rq_unlock(rq); + + return ret; + +} +#endif /* __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW */ +#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struct *p, int cpu) { @@ -2631,17 +2650,17 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags) while (p->on_cpu) { #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW /* - * If called from interrupt context we could have landed in the - * middle of schedule(), in this case we should take care not - * to spin on ->on_cpu if p is current, since that would - * deadlock. + * In case the architecture enables interrupts in + * context_switch(), we cannot busy wait, since that + * would lead to deadlocks when an interrupt hits and + * tries to wake up @prev. So bail and do a complete + * remote wakeup. */ - if (p == current) { - ttwu_queue(p, cpu); + if (ttwu_activate_remote(p, wake_flags)) goto stat; - } -#endif +#else cpu_relax(); +#endif } /* * Pairs with the smp_wmb() in finish_lock_switch(). |
