diff options
author | Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> | 2007-01-05 16:37:04 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.osdl.org> | 2007-01-05 23:55:29 -0800 |
commit | d63b70902befe189ba2672925f28ec3f4db41352 (patch) | |
tree | 727b00bf66ebb3d1de20d630f310429fa5063325 /fs/ufs/balloc.c | |
parent | 7ba3485947ee7bc89a17f86250fe9b692a615dff (diff) | |
download | blackbird-op-linux-d63b70902befe189ba2672925f28ec3f4db41352.tar.gz blackbird-op-linux-d63b70902befe189ba2672925f28ec3f4db41352.zip |
[PATCH] fix garbage instead of zeroes in UFS
Looks like this is the problem, which point Al Viro some time ago:
ufs's get_block callback allocates 16k of disk at a time, and links that
entire 16k into the file's metadata. But because get_block is called for only
a single buffer_head (a 2k buffer_head in this case?) we are only able to tell
the VFS that this 2k is buffer_new().
So when ufs_getfrag_block() is later called to map some more data in the file,
and when that data resides within the remaining 14k of this fragment,
ufs_getfrag_block() will incorrectly return a !buffer_new() buffer_head.
I don't see _right_ way to do nullification of whole block, if use inode
page cache, some pages may be outside of inode limits (inode size), and
will be lost; if use blockdev page cache it is possible to zero real data,
if later inode page cache will be used.
The simpliest way, as can I see usage of block device page cache, but not only
mark dirty, but also sync it during "nullification". I use my simple tests
collection, which I used for check that create,open,write,read,close works on
ufs, and I see that this patch makes ufs code 18% slower then before.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/ufs/balloc.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/ufs/balloc.c | 25 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ufs/balloc.c b/fs/ufs/balloc.c index b82381475779..2e0021e8f366 100644 --- a/fs/ufs/balloc.c +++ b/fs/ufs/balloc.c @@ -275,6 +275,25 @@ static void ufs_change_blocknr(struct inode *inode, unsigned int baseblk, UFSD("EXIT\n"); } +static void ufs_clear_frags(struct inode *inode, sector_t beg, unsigned int n, + int sync) +{ + struct buffer_head *bh; + sector_t end = beg + n; + + for (; beg < end; ++beg) { + bh = sb_getblk(inode->i_sb, beg); + lock_buffer(bh); + memset(bh->b_data, 0, inode->i_sb->s_blocksize); + set_buffer_uptodate(bh); + mark_buffer_dirty(bh); + unlock_buffer(bh); + if (IS_SYNC(inode) || sync) + sync_dirty_buffer(bh); + brelse(bh); + } +} + unsigned ufs_new_fragments(struct inode * inode, __fs32 * p, unsigned fragment, unsigned goal, unsigned count, int * err, struct page *locked_page) { @@ -350,6 +369,8 @@ unsigned ufs_new_fragments(struct inode * inode, __fs32 * p, unsigned fragment, *p = cpu_to_fs32(sb, result); *err = 0; UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag = max_t(u32, UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag, fragment + count); + ufs_clear_frags(inode, result + oldcount, newcount - oldcount, + locked_page != NULL); } unlock_super(sb); UFSD("EXIT, result %u\n", result); @@ -363,6 +384,8 @@ unsigned ufs_new_fragments(struct inode * inode, __fs32 * p, unsigned fragment, if (result) { *err = 0; UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag = max_t(u32, UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag, fragment + count); + ufs_clear_frags(inode, result + oldcount, newcount - oldcount, + locked_page != NULL); unlock_super(sb); UFSD("EXIT, result %u\n", result); return result; @@ -398,6 +421,8 @@ unsigned ufs_new_fragments(struct inode * inode, __fs32 * p, unsigned fragment, *p = cpu_to_fs32(sb, result); *err = 0; UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag = max_t(u32, UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag, fragment + count); + ufs_clear_frags(inode, result + oldcount, newcount - oldcount, + locked_page != NULL); unlock_super(sb); if (newcount < request) ufs_free_fragments (inode, result + newcount, request - newcount); |