Merge tag 'v3.9-rc5' into wq/for-3.10

Writeback conversion to workqueue will be based on top of wq/for-3.10
branch to take advantage of custom attrs and NUMA support for unbound
workqueues.  Mainline currently contains two commits which result in
non-trivial merge conflicts with wq/for-3.10 and because
block/for-3.10/core is based on v3.9-rc3 which contains one of the
conflicting commits, we need a pre-merge-window merge anyway.  Let's
pull v3.9-rc5 into wq/for-3.10 so that the block tree doesn't suffer
from workqueue merge conflicts.

The two conflicts and their resolutions:

* e68035fb65 ("workqueue: convert to idr_alloc()") in mainline changes
  worker_pool_assign_id() to use idr_alloc() instead of the old idr
  interface.  worker_pool_assign_id() goes through multiple locking
  changes in wq/for-3.10 causing the following conflict.

  static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
  {
	  int ret;

  <<<<<<< HEAD
	  lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);

	  do {
		  if (!idr_pre_get(&worker_pool_idr, GFP_KERNEL))
			  return -ENOMEM;
		  ret = idr_get_new(&worker_pool_idr, pool, &pool->id);
	  } while (ret == -EAGAIN);
  =======
	  mutex_lock(&worker_pool_idr_mutex);
	  ret = idr_alloc(&worker_pool_idr, pool, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
	  if (ret >= 0)
		  pool->id = ret;
	  mutex_unlock(&worker_pool_idr_mutex);
  >>>>>>> c67bf5361e7e66a0ff1f4caf95f89347d55dfb89

	  return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
  }

  We want locking from the former and idr_alloc() usage from the
  latter, which can be combined to the following.

  static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
  {
	  int ret;

	  lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);

	  ret = idr_alloc(&worker_pool_idr, pool, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
	  if (ret >= 0) {
		  pool->id = ret;
		  return 0;
	  }
	  return ret;
   }

* eb2834285c ("workqueue: fix possible pool stall bug in
  wq_unbind_fn()") updated wq_unbind_fn() such that it has single
  larger for_each_std_worker_pool() loop instead of two separate loops
  with a schedule() call inbetween.  wq/for-3.10 renamed
  pool->assoc_mutex to pool->manager_mutex causing the following
  conflict (earlier function body and comments omitted for brevity).

  static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
  {
  ...
		  spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
  <<<<<<< HEAD
		  mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
	  }
  =======
		  mutex_unlock(&pool->assoc_mutex);
  >>>>>>> c67bf5361e7e66a0ff1f4caf95f89347d55dfb89

		  schedule();

  <<<<<<< HEAD
	  for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu)
  =======
  >>>>>>> c67bf5361e7e66a0ff1f4caf95f89347d55dfb89
		  atomic_set(&pool->nr_running, 0);

		  spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
		  wake_up_worker(pool);
		  spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
	  }
  }

  The resolution is mostly trivial.  We want the control flow of the
  latter with the rename of the former.

  static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
  {
  ...
		  spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
		  mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);

		  schedule();

		  atomic_set(&pool->nr_running, 0);

		  spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
		  wake_up_worker(pool);
		  spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
	  }
  }

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
index 94ba80417748..f5f8a470a647 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
@@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ void pnfs_set_layoutcommit(struct nfs_write_data *wdata);
 void pnfs_cleanup_layoutcommit(struct nfs4_layoutcommit_data *data);
 int pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(struct inode *inode, bool sync);
 int _pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *);
+int pnfs_commit_and_return_layout(struct inode *);
 void pnfs_ld_write_done(struct nfs_write_data *);
 void pnfs_ld_read_done(struct nfs_read_data *);
 struct pnfs_layout_segment *pnfs_update_layout(struct inode *ino,
@@ -407,6 +408,11 @@ static inline int pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline int pnfs_commit_and_return_layout(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static inline bool
 pnfs_ld_layoutret_on_setattr(struct inode *inode)
 {