diff options
author | Maciej Sosnowski <maciej.sosnowski@intel.com> | 2009-04-23 12:31:51 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> | 2009-05-12 14:41:47 -0700 |
commit | 4f005dbe5584fe54c9f6d6d4f0acd3fb29be84da (patch) | |
tree | d9a4add9553af6c50fae59a79e9ab217945a7090 /drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c | |
parent | ca50a51e890b0a62b44b5642c1ba5049909e5a8b (diff) | |
download | blackbird-op-linux-4f005dbe5584fe54c9f6d6d4f0acd3fb29be84da.tar.gz blackbird-op-linux-4f005dbe5584fe54c9f6d6d4f0acd3fb29be84da.zip |
ioatdma: fix "ioatdma frees DMA memory with wrong function"
as reported by Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
ioatdma 0000:00:08.0: DMA-API: device driver frees DMA memory with
wrong function [device address=0x000000007f76f800] [size=2000 bytes]
[map
ped as single] [unmapped as page]
The ioatdma driver was unmapping all regions
(either allocated as page or single) using unmap_page.
This patch lets dma driver recognize if unmap_single or unmap_page should be used.
It introduces two new dma control flags:
DMA_COMPL_SRC_UNMAP_SINGLE and DMA_COMPL_DEST_UNMAP_SINGLE.
They should be set to indicate dma driver to do dma-unmapping as single
(first one for the source, tha latter for the destination).
If respective flag is not set, the driver assumes dma-unmapping as page.
Signed-off-by: Maciej Sosnowski <maciej.sosnowski@intel.com>
Reported-by: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c | 45 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c b/drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c index e4fc33c1c32f..1955ee8d6d20 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/ioat_dma.c @@ -1063,22 +1063,31 @@ static void ioat_dma_cleanup_tasklet(unsigned long data) static void ioat_dma_unmap(struct ioat_dma_chan *ioat_chan, struct ioat_desc_sw *desc) { - /* - * yes we are unmapping both _page and _single - * alloc'd regions with unmap_page. Is this - * *really* that bad? - */ - if (!(desc->async_tx.flags & DMA_COMPL_SKIP_DEST_UNMAP)) - pci_unmap_page(ioat_chan->device->pdev, - pci_unmap_addr(desc, dst), - pci_unmap_len(desc, len), - PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE); - - if (!(desc->async_tx.flags & DMA_COMPL_SKIP_SRC_UNMAP)) - pci_unmap_page(ioat_chan->device->pdev, - pci_unmap_addr(desc, src), - pci_unmap_len(desc, len), - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE); + if (!(desc->async_tx.flags & DMA_COMPL_SKIP_DEST_UNMAP)) { + if (desc->async_tx.flags & DMA_COMPL_DEST_UNMAP_SINGLE) + pci_unmap_single(ioat_chan->device->pdev, + pci_unmap_addr(desc, dst), + pci_unmap_len(desc, len), + PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE); + else + pci_unmap_page(ioat_chan->device->pdev, + pci_unmap_addr(desc, dst), + pci_unmap_len(desc, len), + PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE); + } + + if (!(desc->async_tx.flags & DMA_COMPL_SKIP_SRC_UNMAP)) { + if (desc->async_tx.flags & DMA_COMPL_SRC_UNMAP_SINGLE) + pci_unmap_single(ioat_chan->device->pdev, + pci_unmap_addr(desc, src), + pci_unmap_len(desc, len), + PCI_DMA_TODEVICE); + else + pci_unmap_page(ioat_chan->device->pdev, + pci_unmap_addr(desc, src), + pci_unmap_len(desc, len), + PCI_DMA_TODEVICE); + } } /** @@ -1363,6 +1372,7 @@ static int ioat_dma_self_test(struct ioatdma_device *device) int err = 0; struct completion cmp; unsigned long tmo; + unsigned long flags; src = kzalloc(sizeof(u8) * IOAT_TEST_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL); if (!src) @@ -1392,8 +1402,9 @@ static int ioat_dma_self_test(struct ioatdma_device *device) DMA_TO_DEVICE); dma_dest = dma_map_single(dma_chan->device->dev, dest, IOAT_TEST_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE); + flags = DMA_COMPL_SRC_UNMAP_SINGLE | DMA_COMPL_DEST_UNMAP_SINGLE; tx = device->common.device_prep_dma_memcpy(dma_chan, dma_dest, dma_src, - IOAT_TEST_SIZE, 0); + IOAT_TEST_SIZE, flags); if (!tx) { dev_err(&device->pdev->dev, "Self-test prep failed, disabling\n"); |