cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core

Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:

	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
	freqs.old = old freq...
	freqs.new = new freq...

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);

	/* Change rate here */

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);

This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.

There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..

They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag:
CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them.

All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as
double notification would happen otherwise.

Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
index 5978b94e0340..e3973dae28a7 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
 static struct clk *cpu_clk;
 static struct clk *dmc0_clk;
 static struct clk *dmc1_clk;
-static struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(set_freq_lock);
 
 /* APLL M,P,S values for 1G/800Mhz */
@@ -179,6 +178,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 	unsigned int priv_index;
 	unsigned int pll_changing = 0;
 	unsigned int bus_speed_changing = 0;
+	unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
 	int arm_volt, int_volt;
 	int ret = 0;
 
@@ -193,12 +193,12 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 		goto exit;
 	}
 
-	freqs.old = s5pv210_getspeed(0);
-	freqs.new = s5pv210_freq_table[index].frequency;
+	old_freq = s5pv210_getspeed(0);
+	new_freq = s5pv210_freq_table[index].frequency;
 
 	/* Finding current running level index */
 	if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, s5pv210_freq_table,
-					   freqs.old, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H,
+					   old_freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H,
 					   &priv_index)) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto exit;
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 	arm_volt = dvs_conf[index].arm_volt;
 	int_volt = dvs_conf[index].int_volt;
 
-	if (freqs.new > freqs.old) {
+	if (new_freq > old_freq) {
 		ret = regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator,
 				arm_volt, arm_volt_max);
 		if (ret)
@@ -219,8 +219,6 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 			goto exit;
 	}
 
-	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
 	/* Check if there need to change PLL */
 	if ((index == L0) || (priv_index == L0))
 		pll_changing = 1;
@@ -431,9 +429,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 		}
 	}
 
-	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
-	if (freqs.new < freqs.old) {
+	if (new_freq < old_freq) {
 		regulator_set_voltage(int_regulator,
 				int_volt, int_volt_max);