drbd: don't send out P_BARRIER with stale information

We must only send P_BARRIER for epochs we actually sent P_DATA in.

If we (re-)establish a connection, we reinitialized the
send.current_epoch_nr, but forgot to reset send.current_epoch_writes.

This could result in a spurious P_BARRIER with stale epoch information,
and a disconnect/reconnect cycle once the then "unexpected"
P_BARRIER_ACK is received:
  BAD! BarrierAck #28823 received, expected #28829!

Introduce re_init_if_first_write() and maybe_send_barrier() helpers,
and call them appropriately for read/write/set-out-of-sync requests.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions