[PATCH] x86_64: Undo the earlier changes to remove unrolled copy/memset functions

They cause quite bad performance regressions on Netburst
This is temporary until we can get new optimized functions
for these CPUs.

This undoes changes that were done in 2.6.15 and in 2.6.16-rc1,
essentially bringing the code back to 2.6.14 level. Only change
is I renamed the X86_FEATURE_K8_C flag to X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD
and fixed the check for the flag and also fixed some comments.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 94 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86_64/lib/memset.S b/arch/x86_64/lib/memset.S
index 2aa48f24ed1e..ad397f2c7de8 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/lib/memset.S
+++ b/arch/x86_64/lib/memset.S
@@ -13,6 +13,98 @@
 	.p2align 4
 memset:	
 __memset:
+	movq %rdi,%r10
+	movq %rdx,%r11
+
+	/* expand byte value  */
+	movzbl %sil,%ecx
+	movabs $0x0101010101010101,%rax
+	mul    %rcx		/* with rax, clobbers rdx */
+
+	/* align dst */
+	movl  %edi,%r9d
+	andl  $7,%r9d
+	jnz  .Lbad_alignment
+.Lafter_bad_alignment:
+
+	movl %r11d,%ecx
+	shrl $6,%ecx
+	jz	 .Lhandle_tail
+
+	.p2align 4
+.Lloop_64:
+	decl   %ecx
+	movq  %rax,(%rdi)
+	movq  %rax,8(%rdi)
+	movq  %rax,16(%rdi)
+	movq  %rax,24(%rdi)
+	movq  %rax,32(%rdi)
+	movq  %rax,40(%rdi)
+	movq  %rax,48(%rdi)
+	movq  %rax,56(%rdi)
+	leaq  64(%rdi),%rdi
+	jnz    .Lloop_64
+
+	/* Handle tail in loops. The loops should be faster than hard
+	   to predict jump tables. */
+	.p2align 4
+.Lhandle_tail:
+	movl	%r11d,%ecx
+	andl    $63&(~7),%ecx
+	jz 		.Lhandle_7
+	shrl	$3,%ecx
+	.p2align 4
+.Lloop_8:
+	decl   %ecx
+	movq  %rax,(%rdi)
+	leaq  8(%rdi),%rdi
+	jnz    .Lloop_8
+
+.Lhandle_7:
+	movl	%r11d,%ecx
+	andl	$7,%ecx
+	jz      .Lende
+	.p2align 4
+.Lloop_1:
+	decl    %ecx
+	movb 	%al,(%rdi)
+	leaq	1(%rdi),%rdi
+	jnz     .Lloop_1
+
+.Lende:
+	movq	%r10,%rax
+	ret
+
+.Lbad_alignment:
+	cmpq $7,%r11
+	jbe	.Lhandle_7
+	movq %rax,(%rdi)	/* unaligned store */
+	movq $8,%r8
+	subq %r9,%r8
+	addq %r8,%rdi
+	subq %r8,%r11
+	jmp .Lafter_bad_alignment
+
+	/* Some CPUs run faster using the string instructions.
+	   It is also a lot simpler. Use this when possible */
+
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
+
+	.section .altinstructions,"a"
+	.align 8
+	.quad  memset
+	.quad  memset_c
+	.byte  X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD
+	.byte  memset_c_end-memset_c
+	.byte  memset_c_end-memset_c
+	.previous
+
+	.section .altinstr_replacement,"ax"
+ /* rdi	destination
+  * rsi value
+  * rdx count
+  */
+memset_c:
 	movq %rdi,%r9
 	movl %edx,%r8d
 	andl $7,%r8d		
@@ -29,3 +121,5 @@ __memset:
 	stosb
 	movq %r9,%rax
 	ret
+memset_c_end:
+	.previous