diff options
author | Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2012-10-24 14:07:59 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> | 2012-10-31 20:36:30 -0200 |
commit | 87da7e66a40532b743cd50972fcf85a1f15b14ea (patch) | |
tree | e553258648881176136774013f0fecff876644bb /arch/x86 | |
parent | 35fd3dc58da675d659513384221349ef90749a01 (diff) | |
download | blackbird-op-linux-87da7e66a40532b743cd50972fcf85a1f15b14ea.tar.gz blackbird-op-linux-87da7e66a40532b743cd50972fcf85a1f15b14ea.zip |
KVM: x86: fix vcpu->mmio_fragments overflow
After commit b3356bf0dbb349 (KVM: emulator: optimize "rep ins" handling),
the pieces of io data can be collected and write them to the guest memory
or MMIO together
Unfortunately, kvm splits the mmio access into 8 bytes and store them to
vcpu->mmio_fragments. If the guest uses "rep ins" to move large data, it
will cause vcpu->mmio_fragments overflow
The bug can be exposed by isapc (-M isapc):
[23154.818733] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[ ......]
[23154.858083] Call Trace:
[23154.859874] [<ffffffffa04f0e17>] kvm_get_cr8+0x1d/0x28 [kvm]
[23154.861677] [<ffffffffa04fa6d4>] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xcda/0xe45 [kvm]
[23154.863604] [<ffffffffa04f5a1a>] ? kvm_arch_vcpu_load+0x17b/0x180 [kvm]
Actually, we can use one mmio_fragment to store a large mmio access then
split it when we pass the mmio-exit-info to userspace. After that, we only
need two entries to store mmio info for the cross-mmio pages access
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 60 |
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index 1eefebe5d727..224a7e78cb6c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -3779,7 +3779,7 @@ static int write_exit_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, { struct kvm_mmio_fragment *frag = &vcpu->mmio_fragments[0]; - memcpy(vcpu->run->mmio.data, frag->data, frag->len); + memcpy(vcpu->run->mmio.data, frag->data, min(8u, frag->len)); return X86EMUL_CONTINUE; } @@ -3832,18 +3832,11 @@ mmio: bytes -= handled; val += handled; - while (bytes) { - unsigned now = min(bytes, 8U); - - frag = &vcpu->mmio_fragments[vcpu->mmio_nr_fragments++]; - frag->gpa = gpa; - frag->data = val; - frag->len = now; - - gpa += now; - val += now; - bytes -= now; - } + WARN_ON(vcpu->mmio_nr_fragments >= KVM_MAX_MMIO_FRAGMENTS); + frag = &vcpu->mmio_fragments[vcpu->mmio_nr_fragments++]; + frag->gpa = gpa; + frag->data = val; + frag->len = bytes; return X86EMUL_CONTINUE; } @@ -3890,7 +3883,7 @@ int emulator_read_write(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned long addr, vcpu->mmio_needed = 1; vcpu->mmio_cur_fragment = 0; - vcpu->run->mmio.len = vcpu->mmio_fragments[0].len; + vcpu->run->mmio.len = min(8u, vcpu->mmio_fragments[0].len); vcpu->run->mmio.is_write = vcpu->mmio_is_write = ops->write; vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_MMIO; vcpu->run->mmio.phys_addr = gpa; @@ -5522,28 +5515,44 @@ static int complete_emulated_pio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) * * read: * for each fragment - * write gpa, len - * exit - * copy data + * for each mmio piece in the fragment + * write gpa, len + * exit + * copy data * execute insn * * write: * for each fragment - * write gpa, len - * copy data - * exit + * for each mmio piece in the fragment + * write gpa, len + * copy data + * exit */ static int complete_emulated_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run; struct kvm_mmio_fragment *frag; + unsigned len; BUG_ON(!vcpu->mmio_needed); /* Complete previous fragment */ - frag = &vcpu->mmio_fragments[vcpu->mmio_cur_fragment++]; + frag = &vcpu->mmio_fragments[vcpu->mmio_cur_fragment]; + len = min(8u, frag->len); if (!vcpu->mmio_is_write) - memcpy(frag->data, run->mmio.data, frag->len); + memcpy(frag->data, run->mmio.data, len); + + if (frag->len <= 8) { + /* Switch to the next fragment. */ + frag++; + vcpu->mmio_cur_fragment++; + } else { + /* Go forward to the next mmio piece. */ + frag->data += len; + frag->gpa += len; + frag->len -= len; + } + if (vcpu->mmio_cur_fragment == vcpu->mmio_nr_fragments) { vcpu->mmio_needed = 0; if (vcpu->mmio_is_write) @@ -5551,13 +5560,12 @@ static int complete_emulated_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vcpu->mmio_read_completed = 1; return complete_emulated_io(vcpu); } - /* Initiate next fragment */ - ++frag; + run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_MMIO; run->mmio.phys_addr = frag->gpa; if (vcpu->mmio_is_write) - memcpy(run->mmio.data, frag->data, frag->len); - run->mmio.len = frag->len; + memcpy(run->mmio.data, frag->data, min(8u, frag->len)); + run->mmio.len = min(8u, frag->len); run->mmio.is_write = vcpu->mmio_is_write; vcpu->arch.complete_userspace_io = complete_emulated_mmio; return 0; |