ARM: 6512/1: perf: fix warnings generated by sparse

Russell reported a number of warnings coming from sparse when
checking the ARM perf_event.c files:

| perf_event.c seems to also have problems too:
|
|   CHECK   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:37:1: warning: symbol 'pmu_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:70:1: warning: symbol 'cpu_hw_events' was not declared. Should it be static?
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:1006:1: warning: symbol 'armv6pmu_enable_event' was not declared. Should it be static?
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:1113:1: warning: symbol 'armv6pmu_stop' was not declared. Should it be static?
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:1956:6: warning: symbol 'armv7pmu_enable_event' was not declared. Should it be static?
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3072:14: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3072:14:    expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:1>*<noident>
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3072:14:    got struct frame_tail *tail
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3074:49: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3074:49:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:1>*from
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3074:49:    got struct frame_tail *tail

This patch resolves these issues so we can live in silence
again.

Reported-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
index 4d0423969df9..a68ff1c10dec 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ static void armv7_pmnc_dump_regs(void)
 }
 #endif
 
-void armv7pmu_enable_event(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, int idx)
+static void armv7pmu_enable_event(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, int idx)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -874,7 +874,7 @@ static u32 __init armv7_reset_read_pmnc(void)
 	return nb_cnt + 1;
 }
 
-const struct arm_pmu *__init armv7_a8_pmu_init(void)
+static const struct arm_pmu *__init armv7_a8_pmu_init(void)
 {
 	armv7pmu.id		= ARM_PERF_PMU_ID_CA8;
 	armv7pmu.name		= "ARMv7 Cortex-A8";
@@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ const struct arm_pmu *__init armv7_a8_pmu_init(void)
 	return &armv7pmu;
 }
 
-const struct arm_pmu *__init armv7_a9_pmu_init(void)
+static const struct arm_pmu *__init armv7_a9_pmu_init(void)
 {
 	armv7pmu.id		= ARM_PERF_PMU_ID_CA9;
 	armv7pmu.name		= "ARMv7 Cortex-A9";
@@ -894,12 +894,12 @@ const struct arm_pmu *__init armv7_a9_pmu_init(void)
 	return &armv7pmu;
 }
 #else
-const struct arm_pmu *__init armv7_a8_pmu_init(void)
+static const struct arm_pmu *__init armv7_a8_pmu_init(void)
 {
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-const struct arm_pmu *__init armv7_a9_pmu_init(void)
+static const struct arm_pmu *__init armv7_a9_pmu_init(void)
 {
 	return NULL;
 }