Merge tag 'h8300-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging

Pull h8300 platform removal from Guenter Roeck:
 "The patch series has been in -next for more than one relase cycle.  I
  did get a number of Acks, and no objections.

  H8/300 has been dead for several years, the kernel for it has not
  compiled for ages, and recent versions of gcc for it are broken.
  Remove support for it"

* tag 'h8300-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging:
  CREDITS: Add Yoshinori Sato for h8300
  fs/minix: Drop dependency on H8300
  Drop remaining references to H8/300 architecture
  Drop MAINTAINERS entry for H8/300
  watchdog: Drop references to H8300 architecture
  net/ethernet: Drop H8/300 Ethernet driver
  net/ethernet: smsc9194: Drop conditional code for H8/300
  ide: Drop H8/300 driver
  Drop support for Renesas H8/300 (h8300) architecture

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.txt
index b1b8587b86f0..9290de703450 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.txt
@@ -65,11 +65,6 @@ Possible arch/ problems
 
 Possible arch problems I found (and either tried to fix or didn't):
 
-h8300 - Is such sleeping racy vs interrupts? (See #4a).
-        The H8/300 manual I found indicates yes, however disabling IRQs
-        over the sleep mean only NMIs can wake it up, so can't fix easily
-        without doing spin waiting.
-
 ia64 - is safe_halt call racy vs interrupts? (does it sleep?) (See #4a)
 
 sh64 - Is sleeping racy vs interrupts? (See #4a)