diff options
| author | Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com> | 2013-08-01 18:21:28 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> | 2013-08-05 19:04:05 +0200 |
| commit | 6d5c2d8ca3c15a191a8078316e547c1f4e5ad6eb (patch) | |
| tree | 8b7ee8bbd78d2c0376bdee3010edd6fef4914caa | |
| parent | 2960bc9cceecb5d556ce1c07656a6609e2f7e8b0 (diff) | |
| download | blackbird-op-linux-6d5c2d8ca3c15a191a8078316e547c1f4e5ad6eb.tar.gz blackbird-op-linux-6d5c2d8ca3c15a191a8078316e547c1f4e5ad6eb.zip | |
i915: fix ACPI _DSM warning
Since commit 29a241c (ACPICA: Add argument typechecking for all
predefined ACPI names), _DSM parameters are validated which trigger the
following warning:
ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95)
ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95)
ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95)
ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95)
As the Intel _DSM method seems to ignore this parameter, let's comply to
the ACPI spec and use a Package instead.
Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32602
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c index bcbbaea2a78e..57fe1ae32a0d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static const u8 intel_dsm_guid[] = { 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c }; -static int intel_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg) +static int intel_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func) { struct acpi_buffer output = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL }; struct acpi_object_list input; @@ -46,8 +46,9 @@ static int intel_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg) params[1].integer.value = INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID; params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER; params[2].integer.value = func; - params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER; - params[3].integer.value = arg; + params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE; + params[3].package.count = 0; + params[3].package.elements = NULL; ret = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DSM", &input, &output); if (ret) { @@ -151,8 +152,9 @@ static void intel_dsm_platform_mux_info(void) params[1].integer.value = INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID; params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER; params[2].integer.value = INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_INFO; - params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER; - params[3].integer.value = 0; + params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE; + params[3].package.count = 0; + params[3].package.elements = NULL; ret = acpi_evaluate_object(intel_dsm_priv.dhandle, "_DSM", &input, &output); @@ -205,7 +207,7 @@ static bool intel_dsm_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev) return false; } - ret = intel_dsm(dhandle, INTEL_DSM_FN_SUPPORTED_FUNCTIONS, 0); + ret = intel_dsm(dhandle, INTEL_DSM_FN_SUPPORTED_FUNCTIONS); if (ret < 0) { DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to get supported _DSM functions\n"); return false; |
