blackbird-op-linux/fs/btrfs/tests, branch master

btrfs: Correctly handle empty trees in find_first_clear_extent_bit

2020-01-31T13:01:29+00:00

Raviu reported that running his regular fs_trim segfaulted with the following backtrace: [ 237.525947] assertion failed: prev, in ../fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1595 [ 237.525984] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 237.525985] kernel BUG at ../fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3117! [ 237.525992] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 237.525998] CPU: 4 PID: 4423 Comm: fstrim Tainted: G U OE 5.4.14-8-vanilla #1 [ 237.526001] Hardware name: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. [ 237.526044] RIP: 0010:assfail.constprop.58+0x18/0x1a [btrfs] [ 237.526079] Call Trace: [ 237.526120] find_first_clear_extent_bit+0x13d/0x150 [btrfs] [ 237.526148] btrfs_trim_fs+0x211/0x3f0 [btrfs] [ 237.526184] btrfs_ioctl_fitrim+0x103/0x170 [btrfs] [ 237.526219] btrfs_ioctl+0x129a/0x2ed0 [btrfs] [ 237.526227] ? filemap_map_pages+0x190/0x3d0 [ 237.526232] ? do_filp_open+0xaf/0x110 [ 237.526238] ? _copy_to_user+0x22/0x30 [ 237.526242] ? cp_new_stat+0x150/0x180 [ 237.526247] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x640 [ 237.526278] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs] [ 237.526283] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x640 [ 237.526288] ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x3c/0x60 [ 237.526292] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [ 237.526297] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 237.526303] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x1c0 [ 237.526310] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe That was due to btrfs_fs_device::aloc_tree being empty. Initially I thought this wasn't possible and as a percaution have put the assert in find_first_clear_extent_bit. Turns out this is indeed possible and could happen when a file system with SINGLE data/metadata profile has a 2nd device added. Until balance is run or a new chunk is allocated on this device it will be completely empty. In this case find_first_clear_extent_bit should return the full range [0, -1ULL] and let the caller handle this i.e for trim the end will be capped at the size of actual device. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/izW2WNyvy1dEDweBICizKnd2KDwDiDyY2EYQr4YCwk7pkuIpthx-JRn65MPBde00ND6V0_Lh8mW0kZwzDiLDv25pUYWxkskWNJnVP0kgdMA=@protonmail.com/ Fixes: 45bfcfc168f8 ("btrfs: Implement find_first_clear_extent_bit") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+ Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov Signed-off-by: David Sterba

Btrfs: fix race between adding and putting tree mod seq elements and nodes

2020-01-31T13:01:20+00:00

There is a race between adding and removing elements to the tree mod log list and rbtree that can lead to use-after-free problems. Consider the following example that explains how/why the problems happens: 1) Task A has mod log element with sequence number 200. It currently is the only element in the mod log list; 2) Task A calls btrfs_put_tree_mod_seq() because it no longer needs to access the tree mod log. When it enters the function, it initializes 'min_seq' to (u64)-1. Then it acquires the lock 'tree_mod_seq_lock' before checking if there are other elements in the mod seq list. Since the list it empty, 'min_seq' remains set to (u64)-1. Then it unlocks the lock 'tree_mod_seq_lock'; 3) Before task A acquires the lock 'tree_mod_log_lock', task B adds itself to the mod seq list through btrfs_get_tree_mod_seq() and gets a sequence number of 201; 4) Some other task, name it task C, modifies a btree and because there elements in the mod seq list, it adds a tree mod elem to the tree mod log rbtree. That node added to the mod log rbtree is assigned a sequence number of 202; 5) Task B, which is doing fiemap and resolving indirect back references, calls btrfs get_old_root(), with 'time_seq' == 201, which in turn calls tree_mod_log_search() - the search returns the mod log node from the rbtree with sequence number 202, created by task C; 6) Task A now acquires the lock 'tree_mod_log_lock', starts iterating the mod log rbtree and finds the node with sequence number 202. Since 202 is less than the previously computed 'min_seq', (u64)-1, it removes the node and frees it; 7) Task B still has a pointer to the node with sequence number 202, and it dereferences the pointer itself and through the call to __tree_mod_log_rewind(), resulting in a use-after-free problem. This issue can be triggered sporadically with the test case generic/561 from fstests, and it happens more frequently with a higher number of duperemove processes. When it happens to me, it either freezes the VM or it produces a trace like the following before crashing: [ 1245.321140] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [ 1245.321200] CPU: 1 PID: 26997 Comm: pool Not tainted 5.5.0-rc6-btrfs-next-52 #1 [ 1245.321235] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-0-ga698c8995f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1245.321287] RIP: 0010:rb_next+0x16/0x50 [ 1245.321307] Code: .... [ 1245.321372] RSP: 0018:ffffa151c4d039b0 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 1245.321388] RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff8ae221363c80 RCX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b [ 1245.321409] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8ae221363c80 [ 1245.321439] RBP: ffff8ae20fcc4688 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 1245.321475] R10: ffff8ae20b120910 R11: 00000000243f8bb1 R12: 0000000000000038 [ 1245.321506] R13: ffff8ae221363c80 R14: 000000000000075f R15: ffff8ae223f762b8 [ 1245.321539] FS: 00007fdee1ec7700(0000) GS:ffff8ae236c80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 1245.321591] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 1245.321614] CR2: 00007fded4030c48 CR3: 000000021da16003 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [ 1245.321642] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 1245.321668] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 1245.321706] Call Trace: [ 1245.321798] __tree_mod_log_rewind+0xbf/0x280 [btrfs] [ 1245.321841] btrfs_search_old_slot+0x105/0xd00 [btrfs] [ 1245.321877] resolve_indirect_refs+0x1eb/0xc60 [btrfs] [ 1245.321912] find_parent_nodes+0x3dc/0x11b0 [btrfs] [ 1245.321947] btrfs_check_shared+0x115/0x1c0 [btrfs] [ 1245.321980] ? extent_fiemap+0x59d/0x6d0 [btrfs] [ 1245.322029] extent_fiemap+0x59d/0x6d0 [btrfs] [ 1245.322066] do_vfs_ioctl+0x45a/0x750 [ 1245.322081] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [ 1245.322092] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c [ 1245.322113] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 1245.322126] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x280 [ 1245.322139] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 1245.322155] RIP: 0033:0x7fdee3942dd7 [ 1245.322177] Code: .... [ 1245.322258] RSP: 002b:00007fdee1ec6c88 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ 1245.322294] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fded40210d8 RCX: 00007fdee3942dd7 [ 1245.322314] RDX: 00007fded40210d8 RSI: 00000000c020660b RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 1245.322337] RBP: 0000562aa89e7510 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fdee1ec6d44 [ 1245.322369] R10: 0000000000000073 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fdee1ec6d48 [ 1245.322390] R13: 00007fdee1ec6d40 R14: 00007fded40210d0 R15: 00007fdee1ec6d50 [ 1245.322423] Modules linked in: .... [ 1245.323443] ---[ end trace 01de1e9ec5dff3cd ]--- Fix this by ensuring that btrfs_put_tree_mod_seq() computes the minimum sequence number and iterates the rbtree while holding the lock 'tree_mod_log_lock' in write mode. Also get rid of the 'tree_mod_seq_lock' lock, since it is now redundant. Fixes: bd989ba359f2ac ("Btrfs: add tree modification log functions") Fixes: 097b8a7c9e48e2 ("Btrfs: join tree mod log code with the code holding back delayed refs") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: Add self-tests for btrfs_rmap_block

2020-01-23T16:24:35+00:00

Add RAID1 and single testcases to verify that data stripes are excluded from super block locations and that the address mapping is valid. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov Reviewed-by: David Sterba [ update changelog ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: selftests: Add support for dummy devices

2020-01-23T16:24:34+00:00

Add basic infrastructure to create and link dummy btrfs_devices. This will be used in the pending btrfs_rmap_block test which deals with the block groups. Calling btrfs_alloc_dummy_device will link the newly created device to the passed fs_info and the test framework will free them once the test is finished. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: drop create parameter to btrfs_get_extent()

2020-01-20T15:40:55+00:00

We only pass this as 1 from __extent_writepage_io(). The parameter basically means "pretend I didn't pass in a page". This is silly since we can simply not pass in the page. Get rid of the parameter from btrfs_get_extent(), and since it's used as a get_extent_t callback, remove it from get_extent_t and btree_get_extent(), neither of which need it. While we're here, let's document btrfs_get_extent(). Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: return error pointer from alloc_test_extent_buffer

2019-12-13T13:09:24+00:00

Callers of alloc_test_extent_buffer have not correctly interpreted the return value as error pointer, as alloc_test_extent_buffer should behave as alloc_extent_buffer. The self-tests were unaffected but btrfs_find_create_tree_block could call both functions and that would cause problems up in the call chain. Fixes: faa2dbf004e8 ("Btrfs: add sanity tests for new qgroup accounting code") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: rename btrfs_block_group_cache

2019-11-18T16:51:51+00:00

The type name is misleading, a single entry is named 'cache' while this normally means a collection of objects. Rename that everywhere. Also the identifier was quite long, making function prototypes harder to format. Suggested-by: Nikolay Borisov Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: add dedicated members for start and length of a block group

2019-11-18T16:51:45+00:00

The on-disk format of block group item makes use of the key that stores the offset and length. This is further used in the code, although this makes thing harder to understand. The key is also packed so the offset/length is not properly aligned as u64. Add start (key.objectid) and length (key.offset) members to block group and remove the embedded key. When the item is searched or written, a local variable for key is used. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: David Sterba

Btrfs: fix selftests failure due to uninitialized i_mode in test inodes

2019-09-24T12:45:02+00:00

Some of the self tests create a test inode, setup some extents and then do calls to btrfs_get_extent() to test that the corresponding extent maps exist and are correct. However btrfs_get_extent(), since the 5.2 merge window, now errors out when it finds a regular or prealloc extent for an inode that does not correspond to a regular file (its ->i_mode is not S_IFREG). This causes the self tests to fail sometimes, specially when KASAN, slub_debug and page poisoning are enabled: $ modprobe btrfs modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'btrfs': Invalid argument $ dmesg [ 9414.691648] Btrfs loaded, crc32c=crc32c-intel, debug=on, assert=on, integrity-checker=on, ref-verify=on [ 9414.692655] BTRFS: selftest: sectorsize: 4096 nodesize: 4096 [ 9414.692658] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs free space cache tests [ 9414.692918] BTRFS: selftest: running extent only tests [ 9414.693061] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap only tests [ 9414.693366] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap and extent tests [ 9414.696455] BTRFS: selftest: running space stealing from bitmap to extent tests [ 9414.697131] BTRFS: selftest: running extent buffer operation tests [ 9414.697133] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs_split_item tests [ 9414.697564] BTRFS: selftest: running extent I/O tests [ 9414.697583] BTRFS: selftest: running find delalloc tests [ 9415.081125] BTRFS: selftest: running find_first_clear_extent_bit test [ 9415.081278] BTRFS: selftest: running extent buffer bitmap tests [ 9415.124192] BTRFS: selftest: running inode tests [ 9415.124195] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs_get_extent tests [ 9415.127909] BTRFS: selftest: running hole first btrfs_get_extent test [ 9415.128343] BTRFS critical (device (efault)): regular/prealloc extent found for non-regular inode 256 [ 9415.131428] BTRFS: selftest: fs/btrfs/tests/inode-tests.c:904 expected a real extent, got 0 This happens because the test inodes are created without ever initializing the i_mode field of the inode, and neither VFS's new_inode() nor the btrfs callback btrfs_alloc_inode() initialize the i_mode. Initialization of the i_mode is done through the various callbacks used by the VFS to create new inodes (regular files, directories, symlinks, tmpfiles, etc), which all call btrfs_new_inode() which in turn calls inode_init_owner(), which sets the inode's i_mode. Since the tests only uses new_inode() to create the test inodes, the i_mode was never initialized. This always happens on a VM I used with kasan, slub_debug and many other debug facilities enabled. It also happened to someone who reported this on bugzilla (on a 5.3-rc). Fix this by setting i_mode to S_IFREG at btrfs_new_test_inode(). Fixes: 6bf9e4bd6a2778 ("btrfs: inode: Verify inode mode to avoid NULL pointer dereference") Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204397 Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: stop clearing EXTENT_DIRTY in inode I/O tree

2019-09-09T12:59:17+00:00

Since commit fee187d9d9dd ("Btrfs: do not set EXTENT_DIRTY along with EXTENT_DELALLOC"), we never set EXTENT_DIRTY in inode->io_tree, so we can simplify and stop trying to clear it. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba