| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since page size field is changed from oobblock to writesize. But OneNAND is not updated.
- fix bufferram management at erase operation
This patch includes the NAND/OneNAND state filed too.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While locally preparing some U-Boot patches for ARM based OMAP3 boards, some
using OneNAND and some using NAND, we found some differences in OneNAND and
NAND command address handling.
As this might confuse users (it already confused us), we like to align OneNAND
and NAND address handling.
The issue is that cmd_onenand.c subtracts the onenand base address from the
addresses you type into the u-boot command line so, unlike nand, you can't
use addresses relative to the start of the onenand part e.g. this won't work:
onenand read 82000000 280000 400000
you have to use:
onenand read 82000000 20280000 400000
Looking at recent git, the only board currently using OneNAND is Apollon, and
for this the OneNAND base address is 0 (apollon.h)
#define CFG_ONENAND_BASE 0x00000000
so patch below won't break any existing boards and will align OneNAND and NAND
handling on boards where OneNAND base address is != 0.
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <sakoman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Manikandan Pillai <mani.pillai@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It mis-calculates the block address.
Also fix DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR in env_onenand.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Remove warnings re onenand_read() & write()
|
|
|
[PATCH 3/3] OneNAND support (take #2)
OneNAND support at U-Boot
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
|
