From 6bef4d317193d3badbbfa3f3c593758ace84a629 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Paris Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:43:04 +0000 Subject: Btrfs: use RB_ROOT to intialize rb_trees instead of setting rb_node to NULL btrfs inialize rb trees in quite a number of places by settin rb_node = NULL; The problem with this is that 17d9ddc72fb8bba0d4f678 in the linux-next tree adds a new field to that struct which needs to be NULL for the new rbtree library code to work properly. This patch uses RB_ROOT as the intializer so all of the relevant fields will be NULL'd. Without the patch I get a panic. Signed-off-by: Eric Paris Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h index 1fe1282ef47c..9116c6d0c5a9 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static inline void btrfs_ordered_inode_tree_init(struct btrfs_ordered_inode_tree *t) { mutex_init(&t->mutex); - t->tree.rb_node = NULL; + t->tree = RB_ROOT; t->last = NULL; } -- cgit v1.2.1