; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-stmt-granularity=bb -polly-simplify -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s -match-full-lines ; ; Do not remove the scalar value write of %i.trunc in inner.for. ; It is used by body. ; %i.trunc is synthesizable in inner.for, so some code might think it is ; synthesizable everywhere such that no scalar write would be needed. ; ; Note that -polly-simplify rightfully removes %inner.cond. It should ; not have been added to the instruction list in the first place. ; define void @func(i32 %n, i32* noalias nonnull %A) { entry: br label %for for: %j = phi i32 [0, %entry], [%j.inc, %inc] %j.cmp = icmp slt i32 %j, %n %zero = sext i32 0 to i64 br i1 %j.cmp, label %inner.for, label %exit ; This loop has some unusual properties: ; * It has a known iteration count (1), therefore SCoP-compatible. ; * %i.trunc is synthesizable within the loop ({1,+,1}<%while.body>). ; * %i.trunc is not synthesizable outside of the loop, because its value is ; unknown when exiting. ; (should be 1, but ScalarEvolution currently seems unable to derive that) ; ; ScalarEvolution currently seems to not able to handle the %zero. ; If it becomes more intelligent, there might be other such loop constructs. inner.for: %i = phi i64 [%zero, %for], [%i.inc, %inner.for] %i.inc = add nuw nsw i64 %i, 1 %i.trunc = trunc i64 %i.inc to i32 %i.and = and i32 %i.trunc, 6 %inner.cond = icmp eq i32 %i.and, 0 br i1 %inner.cond, label %body, label %inner.for body: store i32 %i.trunc, i32* %A br label %inc inc: %j.inc = add nuw nsw i32 %j, 1 br label %for exit: br label %return return: ret void } ; CHECK: After accesses { ; CHECK-NEXT: Stmt_inner_for ; CHECK-NEXT: MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 1] ; CHECK-NEXT: [n] -> { Stmt_inner_for[i0, i1] -> MemRef_i_trunc[] }; ; CHECK-NEXT: Stmt_body ; CHECK-NEXT: MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0] ; CHECK-NEXT: [n] -> { Stmt_body[i0] -> MemRef_A[0] }; ; CHECK-NEXT: ReadAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 1] ; CHECK-NEXT: [n] -> { Stmt_body[i0] -> MemRef_i_trunc[] }; ; CHECK-NEXT: }