From e6e1b48023c6abb89d351f5cf95884b013d41b92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Lattner Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:17:12 +0000 Subject: I believe that the code generator now properly handles dead basic blocks. If not, this is a bug, and should be fixed. llvm-svn: 14476 --- llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp') diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp index 194c8b5e6ed..f1f003ba074 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp @@ -65,10 +65,6 @@ bool X86TargetMachine::addPassesToEmitAssembly(PassManager &PM, // FIXME: Implement the invoke/unwind instructions! PM.add(createLowerInvokePass()); - // FIXME: The code generator does not properly handle functions with - // unreachable basic blocks. - PM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass()); - // FIXME: Implement the switch instruction in the instruction selector! PM.add(createLowerSwitchPass()); @@ -126,10 +122,6 @@ void X86JITInfo::addPassesToJITCompile(FunctionPassManager &PM) { // FIXME: Implement the invoke/unwind instructions! PM.add(createLowerInvokePass()); - // FIXME: The code generator does not properly handle functions with - // unreachable basic blocks. - PM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass()); - // FIXME: Implement the switch instruction in the instruction selector! PM.add(createLowerSwitchPass()); -- cgit v1.2.3