From a4da0d6294926cc3899c4268c7c498029a08830c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nate Begeman Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 22:05:10 +0000 Subject: Eliminate MachineFunction& argument from eliminateFrameIndex in x86 Target. Get MachineFunction from MachineInstruction's parent's parent llvm-svn: 15739 --- llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp') diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp index 8c0d08e1b57..dba98d6ed05 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp @@ -372,10 +372,10 @@ eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr(MachineFunction &MF, MachineBasicBlock &MBB, MBB.erase(I); } -void X86RegisterInfo::eliminateFrameIndex(MachineFunction &MF, - MachineBasicBlock::iterator II) const { +void X86RegisterInfo::eliminateFrameIndex(MachineBasicBlock::iterator II) const{ unsigned i = 0; MachineInstr &MI = *II; + MachineFunction &MF = *MI.getParent()->getParent(); while (!MI.getOperand(i).isFrameIndex()) { ++i; assert(i < MI.getNumOperands() && "Instr doesn't have FrameIndex operand!"); -- cgit v1.2.3